SAXO BANK
Hedge Fund Consistency Index, Hedge Funds Research
Hedge Fund Consistency Index  
Midwest Office:
641-472-7373 Ext.112
News Books Scholarly Definitions


FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+ pages of Profiles and Top 20 Rankings. No obligation ever.


User Name:

Password:





 
R-Squared Related Scholarly Compositions

See also: R-Squared Related News, R-Squared Related Books, or R-Squared Home Page.
 
Table of Contents:
 

Changes in the Factor Exposures of Hedge Funds
by R.A. Brealey & E. Kaplanis
London Business School
January, 2001


Abstract
Recent years have seen considerable interest in the activities of hedge funds, commodity trading advisors (CTAs), and the proprietary trading desks of commercial and investment banks. Part of this interest represents a need to understand the investment policies and performance of an important sector of the asset management industry, but the activities of hedge funds have also raised issues of public policy. For example, the decision by George Soros’s Quantum Fund to sell sterling short in the fall of 1992 is widely believed to have brought significant pressure on the currency and to have hastened its departure from the ERM...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Hedge Funds and the Asian Currency Crisis of 1997
by Stephen J. Brown, William N. Goetzmann, & James Park
NYU Stern School of Business, Yale School of Management, & Long Island University
January 13, 1998


Abstract
We test the hypothesis that hedge funds were responsible for the crash in the Asian currencies in late 1997. To do so, we develop estimates of the changing positions of the largest ten currency funds in one currency, the Malaysian ringgit and to a basket of Asian currencies. Our methodology is adapted from the Sharpe’s (1992) style analysis approach that decomposes fund returns...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

On the Performance of Hedge Funds
by B. Liang
Weatherhead School of Management
Case Western Reserve University
May, 1998


Abstract
This paper investigates hedge fund performance and risk. The empirical evidence indicates that hedge funds differ substantially from traditional investment vehicles such as mutual funds. The funds with watermarks significantly outperform the funds without watermarks. The average hedge fund returns are related positively to incentive fees, the size of the fund, and the lockup period. Hedge funds follow dynamic trading strategies and have low systematic risk. There are low correlations among different strategies. Compared with mutual funds, hedge funds offer better risk-return trade-offs: they have higher Sharpe ratios, lower mrket risks, and higher abnormal returns. In the period of January 1994 to December 1996, most hedge funds provide positive abnormal returns. Overall, hedge fund strategies dominate mutual fund strategies, hence hedge funds provide a more efficient investment opportunity set for investors.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Persistence in Hedge Fund Performance: The True Value Of A Track Record
by Harry M. Kat & Faye Menexe
2002


Abstract
In this paper we study the persistence and predictability of several statistical parameters of individual hedge fund returns. We find little evidence of persistence in mean returns but do find strong persistence in hedge funds' standard deviations and their correlation with the stock market. Persistence in skewness and kurtosis is low but this could be due to the small size of the sample used...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Pseudo R-squared measures for Poisson regression models with over- or underdispersion
by Harald Heinzl, & Martina Mittlbock
University of Vienna
March, 2003


Abstract
The Poisson regression model is frequently used to analyze count data. Pseudo R-squared measures for Poisson regression models have recently been proposed and bias adjustments recommended in the presence of small samples and/or a large number of covariates. In practice, however, data are often over- or sometimes even underdispersed as compared to the standard Poisson model...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models
by A. Colin Cameron & Frank A.G. Windmeijer
University of California - Davis & University College London
March 31, 1995


Abstract
For regression models other than the linear model, R-squared type goodness-of-fit summary statistics have been constructed for particular models using a variety of methods. We propose an R-squared measure of goodness of fit for the class of
exponential family regression models, which includes logit, probit, Poisson, geometric, gamma and exponential. This R-squared is defined as the proportionate reduction in uncertainty, measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, due to the inclusion of regressors...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

R-squared and prediction in regression with ordered quantitative response
by Diane Dancer & Andrew Tremayne
University of Sydney, Australia & University of York, UK
July, 2005


Abstract
This paper is concerned with the use of regression methods to predict values of a response variable when that variable is naturally ordered. An application to the prediction of student examination performance is provided and it is argued that, although individual scores are unlikely to be well predicted at the extremes of the range using the conditional mean, conditional on covariates, it is possible to usefully predict where an individual is likely to feature in the rank order of performance...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Use of R-squared in Accounting Research
by Stephen Brown, Kin Lo, & Thomas Lys
1999


Abstract
This study examines the properties of the R-squared metric frequently used in accounting research as a measure of value relevance. Analytical results show that the metric is unreliable in the presence of scale effects. Specifically, we show that the metric is upwardly biased for accounting studies, and the bias is increasing in the scale factor's coefficient of variation...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

What Is the Impact on Pearson Correlation Coefficients and the R Squared Measure of Fit in Regression When Some of the Respondents Are Not Able to Follow the Rating Scale?
by Suzanne L. Slocum, Charles O. Ochieng, & Bruno D. Zumbo
The University of British Columbia
March 22, 2003


Abstract
As was stated in the first paper in this symposium (Zumbo & Ochieng, 2003) the central issue is that there is an unspoken measurement assumption when we analyse Likert / rating scale data. The assumption is that everyone in your population is responding using the same response process – that is, the same thresholds for a given variable. Our question is directed toward ordinary least-
squares regression and Pearson correlation coefficients when this assumption is not true...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 


Back to Scholarly Compositions

See also: R-Squared Related News, R-Squared Related Books, or R-Squared Home Page.

News Books Scholarly Definitions

HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER DISCLOSURES
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or pools that may invest and trade in many different markets, strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should carefully note the following:
  • Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in Hedge Funds.
  • Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by federal or state regulators
  • Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
  • A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
  • A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority over the Hedge Fund.
  • A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be disclosed to investors
  • A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should be reviewed carefully.
  • A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
  • A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s investment strategy or risk levels.
  • A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels; therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
  • Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors.
  • Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to various conflicts of interest.
The above general summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and tax situation.

All performance information is believed to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future results.

The information on the Site is intended for informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors. Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.

The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated, is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy, validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this information.

Any indices and other financial benchmarks shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged, reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index. Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied upon as an accurate measure of comparison.




 |  Privacy Notice  |  Industry Links  |  Terms Of Use  | 

Hedge Fund Data Licensed to Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC by Barclay Trading Group, Ltd.
© Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC, Member NASD, SIPC