SAXO BANK
Hedge Fund Consistency Index, Hedge Funds Research
Hedge Fund Consistency Index  
Midwest Office:
641-472-7373 Ext.112
News Books Scholarly Definitions


FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+ pages of Profiles and Top 20 Rankings. No obligation ever.


User Name:

Password:




 

 Hedge Fund Scholarly Compositions - All Compositions


   
 Table of Contents for R :
 

Rating Banks in Emerging Markets: What Credit Rating Agencies Should Learn From Financial Indicators
by Liliana Rojas-Suarez
Institute for International Economics


Abstract
The rating agencies’ and bank supervisors’ records of prompt identification of banking problems in emerging markets has not been satisfactory. This paper suggests that such deficiencies could be explained by the use of financial indicators that, while appropriate for industrial countries, do not work in emerging
markets. Among the conclusions, this paper shows that the most commonly used indicator of banking problems in industrial countries, the capital-to-asset ratio, has performed poorly as an indicator of banking problems in Latin America and East Asia...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Rational prepayment and the valuation of mortgage-backed securities
by R. Stanton
Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
1995


Abstract
This article presents a new model of mortgage prepayments, based on rational decisions by mortgage holders. These mortgage holders face heterogeneous transaction costs, which are explicitly modeled. The model is estimated using a version of Hansen's (1982) generalized method of moments, and is shown to capture many of the empirical features of mortgage prepayment...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Real Interest Rates and the Default Rate on High-Yield Bonds
by Martin Fridson, Christopher Garman, & Sheng Wu
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Fall, 1997


Abstract
Determinants of the aggregate default rate on high-yield bonds have been of interest at least since 1990 - 1991, when the proportion of defaulting issued reached effectively its highest level since the Great Depression. With recovery by the mid-19902, and a new record volume of issuance in 1993, analysts have wondered whether another wave of financial failures will follow. This research shows that nominal interest rates are not highly correlated with aggregate default rates on high-yield bonds...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Realized Beta: Persistence and Predictability
by Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and Jin Wu
January, 2003


Abstract
A large literature over several decades reveals both extensive concern with the question of time-varying betas and an emerging consensus that betas are in fact time-varying, leading to the prominence of the conditional CAPM. Set against that background, we assess the dynamics in realized betas, vis-à-vis the dynamics in the underlying realized market variance and individual equity covariances with the market. Working in the recently-popularized framework of realized volatility, we are led to a model of nonlinear fractional cointegration: although realized variances and covariances are very highly persistent and fractionally integrated, realized betas, which are simple nonlinear functions of those realized variances and covariances, are less persistent, and arguably best modeled as a standard stationary I(0) process...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Regulatory Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models
by Jose A. Lopez
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
June 30, 1999


Abstract
Beginning in 1998, U.S. commercial banks may determine their regulatory capital
requirements for financial market risk exposure using value-at-risk (VaR) models. Currently, regulators have available three hypothesis-testing methods for evaluating the accuracy of VaR models: the binomial, interval forecast and distribution forecast methods. Given the low power often exhibited by their corresponding hypothesis tests, these methods can often misclassify forecasts from inaccurate models as acceptably accurate. An alternative evaluation method using loss functions based on probability forecasts is proposed. Simulation results indicate that this method is only as capable of differentiating between forecasts from accurate and inaccurate models as the other methods. However, its ability to directly incorporate regulatory loss functions into model evaluations make it a useful complement to the current regulatory evaluation of VaR models.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

The Relative Efficiency of Beta Estimates (Working Paper)
by Jan Bartholdy & Paula Peare
Aarhus School of Business
March, 2001


Abstract
When estimation of beta is based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model the standard
recommendation is to use five years of monthly data and a value-weighted index.
Given the importance of the beta estimate obtained for financial decisions, such as those involved in portfolio management, capital budgeting, and performance
evaluation, there is surprisingly little research evidence in support of this
recommendation. The objective of this paper is to address this shortcoming. For this purpose the relative efficiency of beta estimates which result from using different data frequencies, time periods, and indexes is examined. It is found that five years of monthly data and an equal-weighted index, as opposed to the commonly recommended value-weighted index, provides the most efficient estimate.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

The Relevance of Interest Rate Processes in Pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities
by Ren-Raw Chen & T.L. Tyler Yang
1995


Abstract
This article examines how different interest rate processes affect the pricing of fixed-income securities. Specifically, it explores four widely used interest rate processes: (1) the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, (2) the mean-reverting square-root process, (3) the log-normal process, and (4) the Ho-Lee discrete binomial process. After comparing the mean square errors for prices of Treasury bonds and Goverment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) prices, it appears that the ability to fit the initial term structure is the most important characteristic of a sound interest rate process. In general, the mean square errors of GNMA prices are greater than those of Treasury bonds owing to additional errors in fitting the prepayment function...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Research in Emerging Markets Finance: Looking to the Future
by Geert Bekaert & Campbell R. Harvey
Columbia University, Duke University, & National Bureau of Economic Research
September 11, 2002


Abstract
Much has been learned about emerging markets finance over the past 20 years. These markets have attracted a unique interdisciplinary interest that bridges both investment and corporate finance with international economics, development economics, law, demographics and political science. Our paper focuses on the research areas that are ripe for exploration.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Results on the Standard Error of the Coefficient Alpha Index of Reliability
by Adam Duhachek, Anne T. Coughlan, & Dawn Iacobucci
2005


Abstract
In this research, we investigate the behavior of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha and its new standard error. We systematically analyze the effects of sample size, scale length, strength of item intercorrelations, and scale dimensionality. We demonstrate the beneficial effects of sample size on alpha’s standard error and of scale length and the strengths of item intercorrelations (effects that are substitutes in their benefits) on both alpha and its standard error. Our findings also speak to this adage: Heterogeneity within the item covariance matrix
(e.g. through multidimensionality or poor items) negatively impacts reliability by decreasing the precision of the estimation. We also examined the question of “equilibrium ”scale length, showing the conditions for which it is optimal to add no items, or one, or multiple items to a scale. In terms of “best practices,” we recommend that researchers report a confidence interval or standard error along with the coefficient alpha point estimate.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Return Distributions of Private Real Estate Investments
by Roger Jelks Brown
The Pennsylvania State University - The Graduate School
Department of Insurance and Real Estate
May, 2000


Abstract
This dissertation investigates the distribution of returns accruing to individual
owners of investment real estate property. Previously, most research in investment real estate concentrated upon large institutional owners using finance paradigms, tools and methodology.
Other researchers have questioned the use of finance models, predominantly
Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), for real estate research...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk2: Measuring the Risk in Value at Risk
by Philippe Jorion
December, 1996


Abstract
Jorion shows how value at risk (VAR), a measure of worst-case loss for a derivatives position, is itself subject to estimation risk. He evaluates two methods of estimation, the sample quantile method and the sample standard deviation method. A more precise VAR measure is obtained when derived as a weighted function of the standard deviation of portfolio value...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures and Implied Risk-Attitudes
by Auke Plantinga & Sebastiaan De Groot
DePaul University & EIM Management (USA) Inc.


Abstract
In this article we study the relation between performance measures and preferences functions. In particular, we examine to what extent performance measures can be used as alternatives for preference functions. We study the Sharpe ratio, Sharpe's alpha, the expected return measure, the Sortino ratio, the Fouse index, and the upside potential ratio...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Arbitrage Performance for Stock Swap Offers with Collars
by Ben Branch & Jia Wang
University of Massachusetts at Amherst


Abstract
Herein we investigate the risk return characteristics of risk arbitrage for a sample
of 187 stock swap offers in the form of collars for the 1994-2003 period. Using cross sectional analysis, we find that arbitrage spreads, defined as the percentage difference between the offer price and the target market price after the merger announcement, are significantly positively correlated with the acquirer’s stock volatility and the deal duration. We also find that arbitrage spreads are significantly lower for successful deals than for failed deals; lower for challenged deals than for unchallenged deals. Using time series analysis, we identify a significant non-linear relationship in the risk return profile for risk arbitrage portfolios: Both strategy I (long the target for the fixed value collar offers; long the target and short the acquirer for the fixed ratio collar offers) and strategy II (delta hedging) produce returns that are strongly positively correlated with the market return in a severely declining market and are not significantly correlated with the market return in a flat or rising market. Given the nonlinear payoff pattern, linear asset pricing models tend to mis-estimate the magnitude of excess returns. For strategy I, our samples produced an estimated annual excess return of 6.3% when we used contingent claims analysis as our base model. This estimated excess return level is less than the 11.88% return when CAPM, or the 10.27% return when Fama-French three factor models are assumed to be the base model. For strategy II, assuming contingent claims analysis as our base model produced an annual excess return of 22.7%. Using CAPM and Fama-French
models produced annual excess returns of 9.25% and 8.6% respectively for our
sample of collar mergers.

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Arbitrage Profits and the Probability of Takeover Success
by Ben Branch, Huong Ngo Higgins, & Kathryn Wilkens
University of Massachusetts at Amherst & Worcester Polytechnic Institute
January, 2003


Abstract
Prior literature shows that relative firm size, low firm leverage, and relatively low growth can increase a firm's chance of becoming a takeover target and increase the probability of merger success. We show that adding information about analyst coverage significantly improves models of merger success based on financial variables that proxy for firm size, leverage, and growth. The probability of merger success is inversely related to analyst coverage at the time of the announcement...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Arbitrage in U.S. Financial Markets
by Supreena Narayanan
Stockholm School of Economics
2004


Abstract
This paper analyses risk arbitrage in U.S. financial markets. The study by Mitchell, Mark and Todd Pulvino (2001) has been extended to study the U.S. financial markets scenario from 1963 to 2004. In particular, two research questions are pursued. What are the effects of stock market, business conditions as well as the Merger and Acquisition Trend on risk arbitrage activities in the U.S...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

The Risk in Fixed-Income Hedge Fund Styles
by William Fung & David A. Hsieh
London Business School & Duke University
August, 2002


Abstract
This paper studies the risk in fixed-income hedge fund styles. Principal component analysis is applied to groups of fixed-income hedge funds to extract common sources of risk and return. These common sources of risk are related to market risk factors, such as changes in interest rate spreads and options on interest rate spreads...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Case of Convertible Arbitrage
by Vikas Agarwal, William H. Fung, Yee Cheng Loon, & Narayan Y. Naik
Georgia State University & London Business School
September 16, 2004


Abstract
Using data on Japanese and US convertible bonds and underlying stocks, we analyze the risk-return characteristics of convertible arbitrage funds. We hypothesize that there are three primitive trading strategies that explain convertible arbitrage funds’ returns – positive carry, volatility arbitrage, and credit arbitrage. We refer to these as asset-based style (“ABS”) factors...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory & Evidence from Trend Followers
by William Fung & David A. Hsieh
PI Asset Management, LLC & Duke University
2001


Abstract
Hedge fund strategies typically generate option-like returns. Linear-factor models using benchmark asset indices have difficulty explaining them. Following the suggestions in Glosten and Jagannarthan (1994), this article shows how to model hedge fund returns by focusing on the popular "trend-following" strategy...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Management for Hedge Funds: Introduction and Overview
by Andrew W. Lo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
June 7, 2001


Abstract
Although risk management has been a well-ploughed field in financial modeling for over two decades, traditional risk management tools such as mean-variance analysis, beta, and Value-at-Risk do not capture many of the risk exposures of hedge-fund investments. In this article, I review several aspects of risk management that are unique to hedge funds - survivorship bias, dynamic risk analytics, liquidity, and nonlinearities - and provide examples that illustrate their potential importance to hedge-fund managers and investors. I propose a research agenda for developing a new set of risk analytics specifically designed for hedge-fund investments, with the ultimate goal of creating risk transparency while, at the same time, protecting the proprietary nature of hedge-fund investment strategies...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Measurement: An Introduction to Value at Risk
by Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
January, 1999


Abstract
This paper is a self-contained introduction to the concept and methodology of “value at risk,” which is a new tool for measuring an entity’s exposure to market risk. We explain the concept of value at risk, and then describe in detail the three methods for computing it: historical simulation; the variance-covariance method; and Monte Carlo or stochastic simulation. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods for computing value at risk...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Risk Preference Estimation in the Non-Linear Mean Standard Deviation Approach
by Atanu Saha

Abstract
Risk preferences and technology are jointly estimated in the nonlinear mean-standard deviation framework for a competitive firm model under price risk. A utility function is proposed that nests various risk preference structures and risk neutrality as empirically refutable special cases. The empirical application using firm-level data finds evidence of decreasing absolute risk aversion, differences in the nature of relative risk aversion by firm size, and little support for the widely used linear mean-variance framework...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

RISK AND RETURN IN FIXED INCOME ARBITRAGE: NICKELS IN FRONT OF A STEAMROLLER?
by Jun Liu & Francis A. Longstaff
UCLA Anderson School & The NBER
April, 2004


Abstract
We conduct an analysis of the risk and return characteristics of fixed income arbi-
trage. We show that a widely-used fixed income arbitrage strategy based on swap spreads generates sizable positive excess returns over an extended period. We find, however, that most of these excess returns represent compensation for risk; there is very little “arbitrage” in this fixed income arbitrage strategy...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

The Risks Underlying Hedge Funds Strategies
by Maha Soueissy & Rami Sidani
Universite de Lausanne
December, 2003


Abstract
This paper establishes a theoretical risk matrix based on 23 different hedge funds
strategies and their underlying risk factors. It studies in parallel the impact of some of the major market crises of the last decade on ten of the largest hedge funds strategies. Dominant risks are identified for each crisis and each hedge fund style and put into matrices...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

Robust Tests of Market Efficiency using Statistical Arbitrage
by Melvyn Teo, Yiu Kuen Tse, & Mitch Warachka
Singapore Management University
April, 2004


Abstract
This paper develops robust tests of market efficiency using statistical arbitrage which circumvent the joint-hypotheses dilemma confounding the traditional literature. Hogan, Jarrow, Teo and Warachka (2004) identify statistical arbitrage opportunities in momentum and value strategies. However, their results are sensitive to the assumption that expected incremental trading profits are constant...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models
by A. Colin Cameron & Frank A.G. Windmeijer
University of California - Davis & University College London
March 31, 1995


Abstract
For regression models other than the linear model, R-squared type goodness-of-fit summary statistics have been constructed for particular models using a variety of methods. We propose an R-squared measure of goodness of fit for the class of
exponential family regression models, which includes logit, probit, Poisson, geometric, gamma and exponential. This R-squared is defined as the proportionate reduction in uncertainty, measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, due to the inclusion of regressors...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

R-squared and prediction in regression with ordered quantitative response
by Diane Dancer & Andrew Tremayne
University of Sydney, Australia & University of York, UK
July, 2005


Abstract
This paper is concerned with the use of regression methods to predict values of a response variable when that variable is naturally ordered. An application to the prediction of student examination performance is provided and it is argued that, although individual scores are unlikely to be well predicted at the extremes of the range using the conditional mean, conditional on covariates, it is possible to usefully predict where an individual is likely to feature in the rank order of performance...

View entire composition                                                                                               top
 

 

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z
 
News Books Scholarly Definitions

HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER DISCLOSURES
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or pools that may invest and trade in many different markets, strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should carefully note the following:
  • Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in Hedge Funds.
  • Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by federal or state regulators
  • Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
  • A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
  • A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority over the Hedge Fund.
  • A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be disclosed to investors
  • A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should be reviewed carefully.
  • A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
  • A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s investment strategy or risk levels.
  • A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels; therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
  • Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors.
  • Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to various conflicts of interest.
The above general summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and tax situation.

All performance information is believed to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future results.

The information on the Site is intended for informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors. Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.

The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated, is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy, validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this information.

Any indices and other financial benchmarks shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged, reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index. Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied upon as an accurate measure of comparison.




 |  Privacy Notice  |  Industry Links  |  Terms Of Use  | 

Hedge Fund Data Licensed to Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC by Barclay Trading Group, Ltd.
© Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC, Member NASD, SIPC