FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+
pages of Profiles and Top
20 Rankings.
No obligation ever.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Hedge Fund
Scholarly Compositions - All Compositions |
Table of
Contents for R
:
-
Rating Banks in Emerging Markets:
What Credit Rating Agencies Should Learn From Financial
Indicators
by Liliana Rojas-Suarez
Institute for International Economics
-
Rational prepayment and the
valuation of mortgage-backed securities
by R.
Stanton
Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
1995
-
Real Interest Rates and the
Default Rate on High-Yield Bonds
by Martin Fridson, Christopher Garman, & Sheng Wu
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Fall, 1997
-
Realized Beta: Persistence and
Predictability
by Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and
Jin Wu
January, 2003
-
Regulatory Evaluation of
Value-at-Risk Models
by Jose A. Lopez
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
June 30, 1999
-
The Relative Efficiency of Beta
Estimates
(Working Paper)
by Jan Bartholdy & Paula Peare
Aarhus School of Business
March, 2001
-
The Relevance of Interest Rate
Processes in Pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities
by Ren-Raw
Chen & T.L. Tyler Yang
1995
-
Research in Emerging Markets
Finance: Looking to the Future
by Geert Bekaert & Campbell R. Harvey
Columbia University, Duke University, & National Bureau of
Economic Research
September 11, 2002
-
Results on the Standard Error of the Coefficient
Alpha Index of Reliability
by Adam Duhachek, Anne T. Coughlan, & Dawn Iacobucci
2005
-
Return Distributions of Private
Real Estate Investments
by Roger Jelks Brown
The Pennsylvania State University - The Graduate School
Department of Insurance and Real Estate
May, 2000
-
Risk2: Measuring the Risk in
Value at Risk
by Philippe Jorion
December, 1996
-
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Measures and Implied Risk-Attitudes
by Auke
Plantinga & Sebastiaan De Groot
DePaul University & EIM Management (USA) Inc.
-
Risk Arbitrage Performance for
Stock Swap Offers with Collars
by Ben Branch & Jia Wang
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
-
Risk Arbitrage Profits and the
Probability of Takeover Success
by Ben Branch, Huong Ngo Higgins, & Kathryn Wilkens
University of Massachusetts at Amherst & Worcester Polytechnic
Institute
January, 2003
-
Risk Arbitrage in U.S. Financial
Markets
by Supreena Narayanan
Stockholm School of Economics
2004
-
The Risk in Fixed-Income Hedge
Fund Styles
by William
Fung & David A. Hsieh
London Business School & Duke University
August, 2002
-
Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Case of Convertible Arbitrage
by Vikas
Agarwal, William H. Fung, Yee Cheng Loon, & Narayan Y. Naik
Georgia State University & London Business School
September 16, 2004
-
The Risk in Hedge Fund
Strategies: Theory & Evidence from Trend Followers
by William Fung & David A. Hsieh
PI Asset Management, LLC & Duke University
2001
-
Risk Management for Hedge Funds:
Introduction and Overview
by Andrew W. Lo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of
Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
June 7, 2001
-
Risk Measurement: An Introduction
to Value at Risk
by Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
January, 1999
-
Risk Preference Estimation in the
Non-Linear Mean Standard Deviation Approach
by Atanu
Saha
-
RISK AND RETURN IN FIXED INCOME
ARBITRAGE: NICKELS IN FRONT OF A STEAMROLLER?
by Jun Liu
& Francis A. Longstaff
UCLA Anderson School & The NBER
April, 2004
-
The Risks Underlying Hedge Funds
Strategies
by Maha Soueissy & Rami Sidani
Universite de Lausanne
December, 2003
-
Robust Tests of Market Efficiency
using Statistical Arbitrage
by Melvyn
Teo, Yiu Kuen Tse, & Mitch Warachka
Singapore Management University
April, 2004
-
An R-squared measure of goodness
of fit for some common nonlinear regression models
by A. Colin
Cameron & Frank A.G. Windmeijer
University of California - Davis & University College London
March 31, 1995
-
R-squared and prediction in
regression with ordered quantitative response
by Diane
Dancer & Andrew Tremayne
University of Sydney, Australia & University of York, UK
July, 2005
|
| |
Rating Banks in Emerging Markets:
What Credit Rating Agencies Should Learn From Financial
Indicators
by Liliana Rojas-Suarez
Institute for International Economics
Abstract
The rating agencies’ and bank supervisors’ records of prompt
identification of banking problems in emerging markets has not
been satisfactory. This paper suggests that such deficiencies
could be explained by the use of financial indicators that,
while appropriate for industrial countries, do not work in
emerging
markets. Among the conclusions, this paper shows that the most
commonly used indicator of banking problems in industrial
countries, the capital-to-asset ratio, has performed poorly as
an indicator of banking problems in Latin America and East
Asia...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Rational prepayment and the
valuation of mortgage-backed securities
by R.
Stanton
Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
1995
Abstract
This article presents a new model of mortgage prepayments, based
on rational decisions by mortgage holders. These mortgage
holders face heterogeneous transaction costs, which are
explicitly modeled. The model is estimated using a version of
Hansen's (1982) generalized method of moments, and is shown to
capture many of the empirical features of mortgage prepayment...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Real Interest Rates and the
Default Rate on High-Yield Bonds
by Martin Fridson, Christopher Garman, & Sheng Wu
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Fall, 1997
Abstract
Determinants of the aggregate default rate on high-yield bonds
have been of interest at least since 1990 - 1991, when the
proportion of defaulting issued reached effectively its highest
level since the Great Depression. With recovery by the
mid-19902, and a new record volume of issuance in 1993, analysts
have wondered whether another wave of financial failures will
follow. This research shows that nominal interest rates are not
highly correlated with aggregate default rates on high-yield
bonds...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Realized Beta: Persistence and
Predictability
by Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and
Jin Wu
January, 2003
Abstract
A large literature over several decades reveals both extensive
concern with the question of time-varying betas and an emerging
consensus that betas are in fact time-varying, leading to the
prominence of the conditional CAPM. Set against that background,
we assess the dynamics in realized betas, vis-à-vis the dynamics
in the underlying realized market variance and individual equity
covariances with the market. Working in the recently-popularized
framework of realized volatility, we are led to a model of
nonlinear fractional cointegration: although realized variances
and covariances are very highly persistent and fractionally
integrated, realized betas, which are simple nonlinear functions
of those realized variances and covariances, are less
persistent, and arguably best modeled as a standard stationary
I(0) process...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Regulatory Evaluation of
Value-at-Risk Models
by Jose A. Lopez
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
June 30, 1999
Abstract
Beginning in 1998, U.S. commercial banks may determine their
regulatory capital
requirements for financial market risk exposure using
value-at-risk (VaR) models. Currently, regulators have available
three hypothesis-testing methods for evaluating the accuracy of
VaR models: the binomial, interval forecast and distribution
forecast methods. Given the low power often exhibited by their
corresponding hypothesis tests, these methods can often
misclassify forecasts from inaccurate models as acceptably
accurate. An alternative evaluation method using loss functions
based on probability forecasts is proposed. Simulation results
indicate that this method is only as capable of differentiating
between forecasts from accurate and inaccurate models as the
other methods. However, its ability to directly incorporate
regulatory loss functions into model evaluations make it a
useful complement to the current regulatory evaluation of VaR
models.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
|
|
The Relative Efficiency of Beta
Estimates (Working Paper)
by Jan Bartholdy & Paula Peare
Aarhus School of Business
March, 2001
Abstract
When estimation of beta is based on the Capital Asset Pricing
Model the standard
recommendation is to use five years of monthly data and a
value-weighted index.
Given the importance of the beta estimate obtained for financial
decisions, such as those involved in portfolio management,
capital budgeting, and performance
evaluation, there is surprisingly little research evidence in
support of this
recommendation. The objective of this paper is to address this
shortcoming. For this purpose the relative efficiency of beta
estimates which result from using different data frequencies,
time periods, and indexes is examined. It is found that five
years of monthly data and an equal-weighted index, as opposed to
the commonly recommended value-weighted index, provides the most
efficient estimate.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Relevance of Interest Rate
Processes in Pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities
by Ren-Raw
Chen & T.L. Tyler Yang
1995
Abstract
This article examines how different interest rate processes
affect the pricing of fixed-income securities. Specifically, it
explores four widely used interest rate processes: (1) the
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, (2) the mean-reverting square-root
process, (3) the log-normal process, and (4) the Ho-Lee discrete
binomial process. After comparing the mean square errors for
prices of Treasury bonds and Goverment National Mortgage
Association (GNMA) prices, it appears that the ability to fit
the initial term structure is the most important characteristic
of a sound interest rate process. In general, the mean square
errors of GNMA prices are greater than those of Treasury bonds
owing to additional errors in fitting the prepayment function...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Research in Emerging Markets
Finance: Looking to the Future
by Geert Bekaert & Campbell R. Harvey
Columbia University, Duke University, & National Bureau of
Economic Research
September 11, 2002
Abstract
Much has been learned about emerging markets finance over the
past 20 years. These markets have attracted a unique
interdisciplinary interest that bridges both investment and
corporate finance with international economics, development
economics, law, demographics and political science. Our paper
focuses on the research areas that are ripe for exploration.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Results on the Standard Error of the Coefficient
Alpha Index of Reliability
by Adam Duhachek, Anne T. Coughlan, & Dawn Iacobucci
2005
Abstract
In this research, we investigate the behavior of Cronbach’s
coefficient alpha and its new standard error. We systematically
analyze the effects of sample size, scale length, strength of
item intercorrelations, and scale dimensionality. We demonstrate
the beneficial effects of sample size on alpha’s standard error
and of scale length and the strengths of item intercorrelations
(effects that are substitutes in their benefits) on both alpha
and its standard error. Our findings also speak to this adage:
Heterogeneity within the item covariance matrix
(e.g. through multidimensionality or poor items) negatively
impacts reliability by decreasing the precision of the
estimation. We also examined the question of “equilibrium ”scale
length, showing the conditions for which it is optimal to add no
items, or one, or multiple items to a scale. In terms of “best
practices,” we recommend that researchers report a confidence
interval or standard error along with the coefficient alpha point
estimate.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Return Distributions of Private
Real Estate Investments
by Roger Jelks Brown
The Pennsylvania State University - The Graduate School
Department of Insurance and Real Estate
May, 2000
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the distribution of returns
accruing to individual
owners of investment real estate property. Previously, most
research in investment real estate concentrated upon large
institutional owners using finance paradigms, tools and
methodology.
Other researchers have questioned the use of finance models,
predominantly
Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), for real estate research...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk2: Measuring the Risk in
Value at Risk
by Philippe Jorion
December, 1996
Abstract
Jorion shows how value at risk (VAR), a measure of worst-case
loss for a derivatives position, is itself subject to estimation
risk. He evaluates two methods of estimation, the sample
quantile method and the sample standard deviation method. A more
precise VAR measure is obtained when derived as a weighted
function of the standard deviation of portfolio value...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Measures and Implied Risk-Attitudes
by Auke
Plantinga & Sebastiaan De Groot
DePaul University & EIM Management (USA) Inc.
Abstract
In this article we study the relation between performance
measures and preferences functions. In particular, we examine to
what extent performance measures can be used as alternatives for
preference functions. We study the Sharpe ratio, Sharpe's alpha,
the expected return measure, the Sortino ratio, the Fouse index,
and the upside potential ratio...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Arbitrage Performance for
Stock Swap Offers with Collars
by Ben Branch & Jia Wang
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Abstract
Herein we investigate the risk return characteristics of risk
arbitrage for a sample
of 187 stock swap offers in the form of collars for the
1994-2003 period. Using cross sectional analysis, we find that
arbitrage spreads, defined as the percentage difference between
the offer price and the target market price after the merger
announcement, are significantly positively correlated with the
acquirer’s stock volatility and the deal duration. We also find
that arbitrage spreads are significantly lower for successful
deals than for failed deals; lower for challenged deals than for
unchallenged deals. Using time series analysis, we identify a
significant non-linear relationship in the risk return profile
for risk arbitrage portfolios: Both strategy I (long the target
for the fixed value collar offers; long the target and short the
acquirer for the fixed ratio collar offers) and strategy II
(delta hedging) produce returns that are strongly positively
correlated with the market return in a severely declining market
and are not significantly correlated with the market return in a
flat or rising market. Given the nonlinear payoff pattern,
linear asset pricing models tend to mis-estimate the magnitude
of excess returns. For strategy I, our samples produced an
estimated annual excess return of 6.3% when we used contingent
claims analysis as our base model. This estimated excess return
level is less than the 11.88% return when CAPM, or the 10.27%
return when Fama-French three factor models are assumed to be
the base model. For strategy II, assuming contingent claims
analysis as our base model produced an annual excess return of
22.7%. Using CAPM and Fama-French
models produced annual excess returns of 9.25% and 8.6%
respectively for our
sample of collar mergers.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Arbitrage Profits and the
Probability of Takeover Success
by Ben Branch, Huong Ngo Higgins, & Kathryn Wilkens
University of Massachusetts at Amherst & Worcester Polytechnic
Institute
January, 2003
Abstract
Prior literature shows that relative firm size, low firm
leverage, and relatively low growth can increase a firm's chance
of becoming a takeover target and increase the probability of
merger success. We show that adding information about analyst
coverage significantly improves models of merger success based
on financial variables that proxy for firm size, leverage, and
growth. The probability of merger success is inversely related
to analyst coverage at the time of the announcement...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Arbitrage in U.S. Financial
Markets
by Supreena Narayanan
Stockholm School of Economics
2004
Abstract
This paper analyses risk arbitrage in U.S. financial markets.
The study by Mitchell, Mark and Todd Pulvino (2001) has been
extended to study the U.S. financial markets scenario from 1963
to 2004. In particular, two research questions are pursued. What
are the effects of stock market, business conditions as well as
the Merger and Acquisition Trend on risk arbitrage activities in
the U.S...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Risk in Fixed-Income Hedge
Fund Styles
by William
Fung & David A. Hsieh
London Business School & Duke University
August, 2002
Abstract
This paper studies the risk in fixed-income hedge fund styles.
Principal component analysis is applied to groups of
fixed-income hedge funds to extract common sources of risk and
return. These common sources of risk are related to market risk
factors, such as changes in interest rate spreads and options on
interest rate spreads...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Case of Convertible Arbitrage
by Vikas
Agarwal, William H. Fung, Yee Cheng Loon, & Narayan Y. Naik
Georgia State University & London Business School
September 16, 2004
Abstract
Using data on Japanese and US convertible bonds and underlying
stocks, we analyze the risk-return characteristics of
convertible arbitrage funds. We hypothesize that there are three
primitive trading strategies that explain convertible arbitrage
funds’ returns – positive carry, volatility arbitrage, and
credit arbitrage. We refer to these as asset-based style (“ABS”)
factors...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Risk in Hedge Fund
Strategies: Theory & Evidence from Trend Followers
by William Fung & David A. Hsieh
PI Asset Management, LLC & Duke University
2001
Abstract
Hedge fund strategies typically generate option-like returns.
Linear-factor models using benchmark asset indices have
difficulty explaining them. Following the suggestions in Glosten
and Jagannarthan (1994), this article shows how to model hedge
fund returns by focusing on the popular "trend-following"
strategy...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Management for Hedge Funds:
Introduction and Overview
by Andrew W. Lo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of
Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
June 7, 2001
Abstract
Although risk management has been a well-ploughed field in
financial modeling for over two decades, traditional risk
management tools such as mean-variance analysis, beta, and
Value-at-Risk do not capture many of the risk exposures of
hedge-fund investments. In this article, I review several
aspects of risk management that are unique to hedge funds -
survivorship bias, dynamic risk analytics, liquidity, and
nonlinearities - and provide examples that illustrate their
potential importance to hedge-fund managers and investors. I
propose a research agenda for developing a new set of risk
analytics specifically designed for hedge-fund investments, with
the ultimate goal of creating risk transparency while, at the
same time, protecting the proprietary nature of hedge-fund
investment strategies...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Measurement: An Introduction
to Value at Risk
by Thomas J. Linsmeier & Neil D. Pearson
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
January, 1999
Abstract
This paper is a self-contained introduction to the concept and
methodology of “value at risk,” which is a new tool for
measuring an entity’s exposure to market risk. We explain the
concept of value at risk, and then describe in detail the three
methods for computing it: historical simulation; the
variance-covariance method; and Monte Carlo or stochastic
simulation. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
the three methods for computing value at risk...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Risk Preference Estimation in the
Non-Linear Mean Standard Deviation Approach
by Atanu
Saha
Abstract
Risk preferences and technology are jointly estimated in the
nonlinear mean-standard deviation framework for a competitive
firm model under price risk. A utility function is proposed that
nests various risk preference structures and risk neutrality as
empirically refutable special cases. The empirical application
using firm-level data finds evidence of decreasing absolute risk
aversion, differences in the nature of relative risk aversion by
firm size, and little support for the widely used linear
mean-variance framework...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
RISK AND RETURN IN FIXED INCOME
ARBITRAGE: NICKELS IN FRONT OF A STEAMROLLER?
by Jun Liu
& Francis A. Longstaff
UCLA Anderson School & The NBER
April, 2004
Abstract
We conduct an analysis of the risk and return characteristics of
fixed income arbi-
trage. We show that a widely-used fixed income arbitrage
strategy based on swap spreads generates sizable positive excess
returns over an extended period. We find, however, that most of
these excess returns represent compensation for risk; there is
very little “arbitrage” in this fixed income arbitrage
strategy...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Risks Underlying Hedge Funds
Strategies
by Maha Soueissy & Rami Sidani
Universite de Lausanne
December, 2003
Abstract
This paper establishes a theoretical risk matrix based on 23
different hedge funds
strategies and their underlying risk factors. It studies in
parallel the impact of some of the major market crises of the
last decade on ten of the largest hedge funds strategies.
Dominant risks are identified for each crisis and each hedge
fund style and put into matrices...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Robust Tests of Market Efficiency
using Statistical Arbitrage
by Melvyn
Teo, Yiu Kuen Tse, & Mitch Warachka
Singapore Management University
April, 2004
Abstract
This paper develops robust tests of market efficiency using
statistical arbitrage which circumvent the joint-hypotheses
dilemma confounding the traditional literature. Hogan, Jarrow,
Teo and Warachka (2004) identify statistical arbitrage
opportunities in momentum and value strategies. However, their
results are sensitive to the assumption that expected
incremental trading profits are constant...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
An R-squared measure of goodness
of fit for some common nonlinear regression models
by A. Colin
Cameron & Frank A.G. Windmeijer
University of California - Davis & University College London
March 31, 1995
Abstract
For regression models other than the linear model, R-squared
type goodness-of-fit summary statistics have been constructed
for particular models using a variety of methods. We propose an
R-squared measure of goodness of fit for the class of
exponential family regression models, which includes logit,
probit, Poisson, geometric, gamma and exponential. This
R-squared is defined as the proportionate reduction in
uncertainty, measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, due to the
inclusion of regressors...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
R-squared and prediction in
regression with ordered quantitative response
by Diane
Dancer & Andrew Tremayne
University of Sydney, Australia & University of York, UK
July, 2005
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the use of regression methods to
predict values of a response variable when that variable is
naturally ordered. An application to the prediction of student
examination performance is provided and it is argued that,
although individual scores are unlikely to be well predicted at
the extremes of the range using the conditional mean,
conditional on covariates, it is possible to usefully predict
where an individual is likely to feature in the rank order of
performance...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
A
B
C D
E F
G
H I
J
K
L
M N
O P
Q
R S
T U
V
W
X Y Z
| HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER
DISCLOSURES |
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge
Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or
pools that may invest and trade in many different markets,
strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and
derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements
as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide
certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information
to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge
Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should
carefully note the following:
- Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a
high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial
portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial
ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the
risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital
set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for
all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in
Hedge Funds.
- Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by
federal or state regulators
- Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and
a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
- An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be
significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge
Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in
a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
- A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or
performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance
which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or
advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not
place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
- A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority
over the Hedge Fund.
- A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single
strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher
risk.
- A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers
or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of
third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be
disclosed to investors
- A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should
be reviewed carefully.
- A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may
cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
- A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its
underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds
structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way
for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the
Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the
sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s
investment strategy or risk levels.
- A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on
foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean
higher risk.
- A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial
regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s
trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are
generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels;
therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged
if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
- Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or
valuation information to investors.
- Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to
various conflicts of interest.
The above general
summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important
disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect
to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and
specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective
offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should
thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the
investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an
investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light
of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and
tax situation.
All performance information is believed
to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No
representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve
its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve
results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or
will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance
is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future
results.
The information on the Site is intended for
informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on
this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as,
financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the
appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be
an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any
security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or
fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the
delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors.
Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the
particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your
financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as
you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice
and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for
the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we
assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions
or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any
person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.
The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated,
is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the
more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a
particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly
from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment
returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied
by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although
believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its
completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express
or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy,
validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this
information.
Any indices and other financial benchmarks
shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged,
reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the
impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an
index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have
volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a
particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold
substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index.
Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are
not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge
fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of
an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied
upon as an accurate measure of comparison.
|
|