FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+
pages of Profiles and Top
20 Rankings.
No obligation ever.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Hedge Fund
Scholarly Compositions - Featured Authors
select biographies of scholarly composition contributors
|
|
click here to
contribute your scholarly composition and biography |
| |
 |
|
Dr. Lionel Martellini
Professor of Finance & Scientific Director
EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre
Professional Home Page
Brief Biography:
Professor of Finance
and Scientific Director of the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management
Research Centre. Pr. Martellini oversees the Centre’s six industry
sponsored programmes which focus on asset allocation and risk
management in the traditional and alternative universes. He has
worked as a consultant in the fields of alternative investment,
fixed income securities, quantitative finance and derivatives; he
sits on the four member academic advisory board of Old Mutual Asset
Managers' global equity market neutral strategy team.
Pr. Martellini’s research has been published in leading academic and
practitioner journals and featured in major European and global
business dailies. He has also co-authored reference texts on Fixed
Income Management and Alternative Investment. Pr. Martellini
frequently delivers presentations at top asset management and
alternative investment industry conferences. Pr. Martellini is on
the editorial advisory board of the Journal of Portfolio Management
and on the editorial boards of the Journal of Bond Trading and
Management and the Journal of Alternative Investments.
He holds graduate degrees in business administration, economics,
statistics and mathematics, as well as a PhD in Finance from the
Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley.
|
|
Dr. Martellini's Table of Contents
in chronological order
-
Portable Alpha and Portable Beta Strategies in
the Euro Zone
by Noël Amenc, PhD, Philippe Malaise, Lionel Martellini, PhD,
Daphne Sfeir, PhD
October 30, 2003
-
The Alpha and Omega of Hedge Fund
Performance Measurement
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
February 27, 2003
-
Optimal Mixing of Hedge Funds with Traditional
Investment Vehicles
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
February 15, 2003
-
The Brave New World of Hedge Fund
Indices
by Noël Amenc and Lionel Martellini
October 19, 2002
-
Portfolio Optimization and Hedge
Fund Style Allocation Decisions
by N. Amenc & L. Martellini
March 2002
-
Taking a Close Look at the
European Fund of Hedge Funds Industry
by Noel
Amenc, Jean René Giraud, Lionel Martellini, & Mathieu Vaissie
January 4, 2002
|
| |
Portable Alpha and Portable Beta Strategies in
the Euro Zone
by Noël Amenc, PhD, Philippe Malaise, Lionel Martellini, PhD,
Daphne Sfeir, PhD
EDHEC Graduate School of Business
October 30, 2003
Abstract
While stock picking strategies are in principle meant to exploit
evidence of predictability in individual stock specific risk,
most equity managers, as a result of their bottom-up security
selection decisions, often end up making discretionary, and most
of the time unintended, bets on market, sector and style returns
as much as they make bets on individual stock returns. In this
paper, we show how portfolio managers in the Euro-zone can
benefit from using derivatives markets to actively manage their
asset allocation decisions in a systematic manner. Using a
robust econometric process based on a non-linear multi-factor
thick and recursive modeling approach, we report statistically
and economically significant evidence of predictability in Dow
Jones EURO STOXX 50 excess return. These econometric forecasts
can be turned into active portfolio decisions and implemented
via Eurex index futures to generate active asset allocation
portable
alpha benefits. We also show that adding active sector rotation
decisions to asset allocation decisions allows one to
significantly lower the portfolio volatility as a result of the
benefits of bet diversification: We finally explain how active
portfolio managers can benefit from using suitably designed
Eurex option strategies as portable beta vehicles. In
particular, option portfolios can be used to enhance the
performance of tactical asset allocation programs by
consistently adding value during the periods of low volatility
when timing strategies are known to perform rather poorly. The
benefits of active asset allocation decisions reported in this
paper originate from the combination of a robust econometric and
portfolio process on the one hand, and an efficient trading of
low cost investible products such as Eurex index futures and
options on the other hand. This strongly suggests that most
long-short managers could use a similar methodology to enhance
the performance of their portfolios without having to rely on
the alleged
superior performance of any specific predictive model.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
The Alpha and Omega of Hedge Fund
Performance Measurement
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
EDHEC Graduate School of Business & the Marshall School of
Business at the University of Southern California
February 27, 2003
Abstract
That hedge funds start gaining wide acceptance while
they still remain a somewhat mysterious asset class enhances the
need for a better measurement of their performance. This paper
is an attempt to provide a unified picture of hedge fund
managers' ability to generate abnormal returns. To alleviate the
concern over model risk, we consider an extensive set of models
for assessing the risk-adjusted performance of hedge fund
managers. We conclude that hedge funds appear to have
significantly positive alphas when normal returns are measured
by an explicit factor model, even when multiple factors serving
as proxies for credit or liquidity risks are accounted for.
However, hedge funds on average do not have significantly
positive alphas once the entire distribution is
considered or implicit factors are included. While we find
significantly positive alphas for a sub-set of hedge funds
across all possible models, our main contribution is perhaps to
show that (i) different models strongly disagree on the absolute
risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds as evidenced by a very
large dispersion of alphas across models and yet (ii) they
largely agree on hedge funds'relative performance in the sense
that they tend to rank order the funds in the same way.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
Optimal Mixing of Hedge Funds with Traditional
Investment Vehicles
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
EDHEC Graduate School of Business
February 15, 2003
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the state-of-the art techniques for
optimal asset allocation to traditional and alternative
investment vehicles, and we specifically account for the
difficulties in estimating risk/return parameters from hedge
fund return data. We first present various techniques allowing
an investor to better assess the contrasted diversification
properties of hedge funds. In particular, we introduce a
multi-factor framework for the assessment of which funds should
be included for which portfolio. We also present various
competing models allowing investors to get a quantitative
estimate of the optimal fraction of a given portfolio that
should be allocated to hedge funds, in a context where only
imperfect estimates of hedge fund expected returns are
available. We not only discuss optimal strategic asset
allocation decisions; we also explain how tactical asset
decisions can also be made in a portfolio mixing traditional and
alternative investment vehicles. Finally, we show how hedge fund
can be used as portable alpha vehicles in a core/satellite
portfolio approach.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
The Brave New World of Hedge Fund
Indices
by Noël Amenc and Lionel Martellini
October 19, 2002
Abstract
The fact that hedge funds have started to gain widespread
acceptance while remaining a somewhat mysterious asset class
enhances the need for better measurement and benchmarking of
their performance. One serious problem is that existing hedge
fund indices provide a somewhat confusing picture of the
investment universe. In this paper, we first present detailed
evidence of strong heterogeneity in the information conveyed by
competing indices. We also attempt to provide remedies to the
problem and suggest various methodologies designed to help build
a “pure style index”, or “index of the indices” for a given
style. We first explore a statistical approach to the
construction of pure style indices, using Kalman filter
techniques for the estimation of an unobservable factor from
competing index return observations. Because it is desirable
that a pure index can be regarded as a portfolio of existing
indices, and hence a portfolio of underlying funds, we also
suggest a portfolio approach to the problem. In particular, we
suggest to use principal component analysis to extract the “best
possible one-dimensional summary” of a set of competing indices,
and to use minimum variance analysis to extract the “least
biased portfolio” from a set of competing indices. Finally, we
also provide evidence of the ability of pure style indices to
improve benchmarking of hedge fund returns. Our results can
easily be extended to traditional investment styles such as
growth/value, small cap/large
cap.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
Portfolio Optimization and Hedge
Fund Style Allocation Decisions
by N. Amenc & L. Martellini
USC Marshall School of Business - Department of Finance and
Business Economics
March 2002
Abstract
This paper
attempts to evaluate the out-of-sample performance of an
improved estimator of the covariance structure of hedge fund
index returns, focusing on its use for optimal portfolio
selection. Using data from CSFB-Tremont hedge fund indices, we
find that ex-post volatility of minimum variance portfolios
generated using implicit factor based estimation techniques is
between 1.5 and 6 times lower than that of a value-weighted
benchmark, such differences being both economically and
statistically significant. This strongly indicates that optimal
inclusion of hedge funds in an investor portfolio can
potentially generate a dramatic decrease in the portfolio
volatility on an out-of-sample basis. Differences in mean
returns, on the other hand, are not statistically significant,
suggesting that the improvement in terms of risk control does
not necessarily come at the cost of lower expected returns.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
Taking a Close Look at the
European Fund of Hedge Funds Industry
by Noel
Amenc, Jean René Giraud, Lionel Martellini, & Mathieu Vaissie
EDHEC RISK AND ASSET MANAGEMENT RESEARCH CENTRE
January 4, 2002
Abstract
Over the last few years institutional investors’ traditional
portfolios have failed to meet their objectives in terms
of risk and performance. Investors have thus shown growing
interest in new forms of diversification, especially
in investment vehicles that offer better protection during
extreme market conditions. This has naturally led them
to consider hedge funds as part of their investment universe.
The massive arrival of institutional investors in an “industry”
that up until then had been reserved to some High Net Worth
Individuals or Endowments/Foundations resulted in a dramatic
capital inflow and entailed a profound diversification of
investors’ risk profile.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
|
|
| HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER
DISCLOSURES |
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge
Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or
pools that may invest and trade in many different markets,
strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and
derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements
as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide
certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information
to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge
Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should
carefully note the following:
- Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a
high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial
portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial
ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the
risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital
set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for
all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in
Hedge Funds.
- Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by
federal or state regulators
- Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and
a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
- An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be
significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge
Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in
a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
- A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or
performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance
which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or
advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not
place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
- A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority
over the Hedge Fund.
- A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single
strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher
risk.
- A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers
or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of
third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be
disclosed to investors
- A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should
be reviewed carefully.
- A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may
cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
- A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its
underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds
structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way
for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the
Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the
sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s
investment strategy or risk levels.
- A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on
foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean
higher risk.
- A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial
regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s
trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are
generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels;
therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged
if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
- Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or
valuation information to investors.
- Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to
various conflicts of interest.
The above general
summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important
disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect
to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and
specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective
offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should
thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the
investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an
investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light
of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and
tax situation.
All performance information is believed
to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No
representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve
its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve
results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or
will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance
is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future
results.
The information on the Site is intended for
informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on
this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as,
financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the
appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be
an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any
security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or
fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the
delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors.
Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the
particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your
financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as
you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice
and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for
the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we
assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions
or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any
person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.
The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated,
is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the
more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a
particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly
from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment
returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied
by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although
believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its
completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express
or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy,
validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this
information.
Any indices and other financial benchmarks
shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged,
reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the
impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an
index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have
volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a
particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold
substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index.
Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are
not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge
fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of
an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied
upon as an accurate measure of comparison.
|
|