SAXO BANK
Hedge Fund Consistency Index, Hedge Funds Research
Hedge Fund Consistency Index  
Midwest Office:
641-472-7373 Ext.112
News Books Scholarly Definitions


FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+ pages of Profiles and Top 20 Rankings. No obligation ever.


User Name:

Password:





 
Hedge Fund Scholarly Compositions - Featured Authors
select biographies of scholarly composition contributors
 
click here to contribute your scholarly composition and biography
 
  Dr. Lionel Martellini
Professor of Finance & Scientific Director
EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre

Professional Home Page

Brief Biography:
Professor of Finance and Scientific Director of the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre. Pr. Martellini oversees the Centre’s six industry sponsored programmes which focus on asset allocation and risk management in the traditional and alternative universes. He has worked as a consultant in the fields of alternative investment, fixed income securities, quantitative finance and derivatives; he sits on the four member academic advisory board of Old Mutual Asset Managers' global equity market neutral strategy team.

Pr. Martellini’s research has been published in leading academic and practitioner journals and featured in major European and global business dailies. He has also co-authored reference texts on Fixed Income Management and Alternative Investment. Pr. Martellini frequently delivers presentations at top asset management and alternative investment industry conferences. Pr. Martellini is on the editorial advisory board of the Journal of Portfolio Management and on the editorial boards of the Journal of Bond Trading and Management and the Journal of Alternative Investments.

He holds graduate degrees in business administration, economics, statistics and mathematics, as well as a PhD in Finance from the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley.

 
   
     Dr. Martellini's Table of Contents

     in chronological order
 

Portable Alpha and Portable Beta Strategies in the Euro Zone
by Noël Amenc, PhD, Philippe Malaise, Lionel Martellini, PhD, Daphne Sfeir, PhD
EDHEC Graduate School of Business
October 30, 2003


Abstract
While stock picking strategies are in principle meant to exploit evidence of predictability in individual stock specific risk, most equity managers, as a result of their bottom-up security selection decisions, often end up making discretionary, and most of the time unintended, bets on market, sector and style returns as much as they make bets on individual stock returns. In this paper, we show how portfolio managers in the Euro-zone can benefit from using derivatives markets to actively manage their asset allocation decisions in a systematic manner. Using a robust econometric process based on a non-linear multi-factor thick and recursive modeling approach, we report statistically and economically significant evidence of predictability in Dow Jones EURO STOXX 50 excess return. These econometric forecasts can be turned into active portfolio decisions and implemented via Eurex index futures to generate active asset allocation portable
alpha benefits. We also show that adding active sector rotation decisions to asset allocation decisions allows one to significantly lower the portfolio volatility as a result of the benefits of bet diversification: We finally explain how active portfolio managers can benefit from using suitably designed Eurex option strategies as portable beta vehicles. In particular, option portfolios can be used to enhance the
performance of tactical asset allocation programs by consistently adding value during the periods of low volatility when timing strategies are known to perform rather poorly. The benefits of active asset allocation decisions reported in this paper originate from the combination of a robust econometric and portfolio process on the one hand, and an efficient trading of low cost investible products such as Eurex index futures and options on the other hand. This strongly suggests that most long-short managers could use a similar methodology to enhance the performance of their portfolios without having to rely on the alleged
superior performance of any specific predictive model.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                 top
 

 

The Alpha and Omega of Hedge Fund Performance Measurement
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
EDHEC Graduate School of Business & the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California
February 27, 2003


Abstract
That hedge funds start gaining wide acceptance while they still remain a somewhat mysterious asset class enhances the need for a better measurement of their performance. This paper is an attempt to provide a unified picture of hedge fund managers' ability to generate abnormal returns. To alleviate the concern over model risk, we consider an extensive set of models for assessing the risk-adjusted performance of hedge fund managers. We conclude that hedge funds appear to have significantly positive alphas when normal returns are measured by an explicit factor model, even when multiple factors serving as proxies for credit or liquidity risks are accounted for. However, hedge funds on average do not have significantly positive alphas once the entire distribution is
considered or implicit factors are included. While we find significantly positive alphas for a sub-set of hedge funds across all possible models, our main contribution is perhaps to show that (i) different models strongly disagree on the absolute risk-adjusted performance of hedge funds as evidenced by a very large dispersion of alphas across models and yet (ii) they largely agree on hedge funds'relative performance in the sense that they tend to rank order the funds in the same way.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                  top
 

 

Optimal Mixing of Hedge Funds with Traditional Investment Vehicles
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
EDHEC Graduate School of Business
February 15, 2003


Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the state-of-the art techniques for optimal asset allocation to traditional and alternative investment vehicles, and we specifically account for the difficulties in estimating risk/return parameters from hedge fund return data. We first present various techniques allowing an investor to better assess the contrasted diversification properties of hedge funds. In particular, we introduce a multi-factor framework for the assessment of which funds should be included for which portfolio. We also present various competing models allowing investors to get a quantitative estimate of the optimal fraction of a given portfolio that should be allocated to hedge funds, in a context where only imperfect estimates of hedge fund expected returns are available. We not only discuss optimal strategic asset allocation decisions; we also explain how tactical asset decisions can also be made in a portfolio mixing traditional and alternative investment vehicles. Finally, we show how hedge fund can be used as portable alpha vehicles in a core/satellite portfolio approach.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                top
 

 

The Brave New World of Hedge Fund Indices
by Noël Amenc and Lionel Martellini
October 19, 2002


Abstract
The fact that hedge funds have started to gain widespread acceptance while remaining a somewhat mysterious asset class enhances the need for better measurement and benchmarking of their performance. One serious problem is that existing hedge fund indices provide a somewhat confusing picture of the investment universe. In this paper, we first present detailed evidence of strong heterogeneity in the information conveyed by competing indices. We also attempt to provide remedies to the problem and suggest various methodologies designed to help build a “pure style index”, or “index of the indices” for a given style. We first explore a statistical approach to the construction of pure style indices, using Kalman filter techniques for the estimation of an unobservable factor from competing index return observations. Because it is desirable that a pure index can be regarded as a portfolio of existing indices, and hence a portfolio of underlying funds, we also suggest a portfolio approach to the problem. In particular, we suggest to use principal component analysis to extract the “best possible one-dimensional summary” of a set of competing indices, and to use minimum variance analysis to extract the “least biased portfolio” from a set of competing indices. Finally, we also provide evidence of the ability of pure style indices to improve benchmarking of hedge fund returns. Our results can easily be extended to traditional investment styles such as growth/value, small cap/large
cap.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                 top
 

 

Portfolio Optimization and Hedge Fund Style Allocation Decisions
by N. Amenc & L. Martellini
USC Marshall School of Business - Department of Finance and Business Economics
March 2002


Abstract
This paper attempts to evaluate the out-of-sample performance of an improved estimator of the covariance structure of hedge fund index returns, focusing on its use for optimal portfolio selection. Using data from CSFB-Tremont hedge fund indices, we find that ex-post volatility of minimum variance portfolios generated using implicit factor based estimation techniques is between 1.5 and 6 times lower than that of a value-weighted benchmark, such differences being both economically and statistically significant. This strongly indicates that optimal inclusion of hedge funds in an investor portfolio can potentially generate a dramatic decrease in the portfolio volatility on an out-of-sample basis. Differences in mean returns, on the other hand, are not statistically significant, suggesting that the improvement in terms of risk control does not necessarily come at the cost of lower expected returns.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                 top
 

 

Taking a Close Look at the European Fund of Hedge Funds Industry
by Noel Amenc, Jean René Giraud, Lionel Martellini, & Mathieu Vaissie
EDHEC RISK AND ASSET MANAGEMENT RESEARCH CENTRE
January 4, 2002


Abstract
Over the last few years institutional investors’ traditional portfolios have failed to meet their objectives in terms of risk and performance. Investors have thus shown growing interest in new forms of diversification, especially in investment vehicles that offer better protection during extreme market conditions. This has naturally led them to consider hedge funds as part of their investment universe. The massive arrival of institutional investors in an “industry” that up until then had been reserved to some High Net Worth Individuals or Endowments/Foundations resulted in a dramatic capital inflow and entailed a profound diversification of investors’ risk profile.

Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full paper...                                                 top
 

 



HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER DISCLOSURES
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or pools that may invest and trade in many different markets, strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should carefully note the following:
  • Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in Hedge Funds.
  • Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by federal or state regulators
  • Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
  • An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
  • A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
  • A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority over the Hedge Fund.
  • A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be disclosed to investors
  • A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should be reviewed carefully.
  • A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
  • A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s investment strategy or risk levels.
  • A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean higher risk.
  • A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels; therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
  • Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors.
  • Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to various conflicts of interest.
The above general summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and tax situation.

All performance information is believed to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future results.

The information on the Site is intended for informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors. Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.

The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated, is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy, validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this information.

Any indices and other financial benchmarks shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged, reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index. Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied upon as an accurate measure of comparison.




 |  Privacy Notice  |  Industry Links  |  Terms Of Use  | 

Hedge Fund Data Licensed to Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC by Barclay Trading Group, Ltd.
© Mt. Rushmore Securities LLC, Member NASD, SIPC