FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+
pages of Profiles and Top
20 Rankings.
No obligation ever.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Hedge Fund
Scholarly Compositions - All Compositions |
Table of
Contents for D
:
-
The Dangers of Historical Hedge
Fund Data
by Andrew
B. Weisman & Jerome D. Abernathy
July 2003
-
The Dangers of Mechanical
Investment Decision-Making: The Case of Hedge Funds
by Harry M. Kat
November 28, 2003
-
Dealers’ Hedging of Interest Rate
Options in the U.S. Dollar Fixed-Income Market
by John E.
Kambhu
Stern School of Business, New York University & Stanford
University
-
Debt Crises and the Development
of International Capital Markets
by Andrea Pescatori & Amadou N.R. Sy
-
A Decomposition of Stock Index
Futures Mispricing and the Price Effects of Index Arbitrage
by Andrew
West
February, 2003
-
Defaults & Returns on High Yield
Bonds: Analysis Through 2001
by Edward I. Altman and Pablo Arman
-
The Default Risk of High-Yield
Bonds
by Cynthia G. McDonald & Linda M. Van De Gucht
University of Missouri at Columbia & Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven
July, 1996
-
Derivation of the Mean-Gini
Efficient Portfolio Frontier
by Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and Hebrew University of
Jerusalem
October 3, 2002
-
Detecting Changes of the
Efficient Frontier Allocation in an Elliptical Model
by Taras Bodnar & Wolfgang Schmid
Department of Statistics, European University Viadrina
-
Detecting Switching Strategies in
Equity Hedge Funds
by Carol Alexander & Anca Dimitriu
ISMA Centre, University of Reading
April, 2005
-
Determinants and Implications of
Arbitrage Holdings in Acquisitions
by Jim Hsieh & Ralph A. Walkling
Ohio State University
June, 1999
-
Deviation Measures in Generalized
Linear Regression
by R.
Tyrrell Rockafellar, Stanislav Uryasev, & Michael Zabarankin
University of Florida, Gainesville
December 21, 2002
-
Differentiability of the
Efficient Frontier when Commitment to Risk Sharing is Limited
by Thorsten V. Koeppl
European Central Bank
February, 2003
-
Direct Tests of Index Arbitrage
Models
by Robert
Neal
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
December, 1996
-
Distressed Debt-Investing in
Deutschland
by Christoph Schalast and Christian Daynes
HfB Business School of Finance & Management
September, 2005
-
Diversification Benefits and
Persistence of U.S.-Based Global Bond Funds
by Sirapat Polwitoon & Oranee Tawatnuntachai
Sigmund Weis School of Business & School of Business
Administration - Penn State
May, 2005
-
Diversification into the Entire
Economy: The Moral Imperative of the Super Efficient Portfolio
on the Efficient Frontier
by Herbert A. Whitehouse
Whitehouse Law Firm
-
Diversification and Persistence
in Hedge Funds
by Craig W. French, Damian B. Ko, & David Abuaf
Corbin Capital Partners, L.P.
October 31, 2005
-
The Diversification Properties of
Hedge Fund Investments
by Eckhard Freimann
Imperial College, London
-
Diversification and Yield
Enhancement with Hedge Funds
by Gaurav S. Amin & Harry M. Kat
Schroder Hedge Funds, London & Cass Business School - City
University, London
October 7, 2002
-
Diversifying among Hedge Fund
Strategies: An Alternative Frontier
by Emily Perskie
Duke University
Spring 2003
-
Diversifying Market Risk through Market-Neutral
Strategies
by Marco A. Navone
Financial Markets & Institutions Department - Bocconi University
September 19, 2001
-
Do Banks Strategically Time
Public Bond Issuance to Manipulate the Accompanying Disclosure,
Due Diligence, and Investor Scrutiny?
by Daniel M. Covitz & Paul Harrison
Federal Reserve Board
April, 2002
-
Does Alpha Really Matter? Evidence from Mutual
Fund Incubation, Termination and Manager Change
by Richard B. Evans
January 2004
-
Does Foreign Ownership Contribute
to Sounder Banks in Emerging Markets? The Latin American
Experience
by Jennifer S. Crystal, B. Gerard Dages, & Linda S. Goldberg
by Federal Reserve Bank of New York
May 29, 2001
-
Does the Use of Financial
Derivatives Affect Earnings Management Decisions?
by Jan Barton
Goizueta Business School - Emory University
January 22, 2000
-
Do fixed income securities also
show asymmetric effects in conditional second moments?
by Lorenzo
Cappiello
-
Do Hedge Funds Have Enough
Capital? A Value-at-Risk Approach
by Anurag
Gupta & Bing Liang
February, 2003
-
Do Market Intermediaries Hedge
their Risk Exposure with Derivatives? Evidence from UK Govt.
Bond Dealers’ Spot & Derivatives Positions
by Narayan Y. Naik and Pradeep K. Yadav
February, 2000
-
Do Market Timing Hedge Funds Time
the Market?
by Bing
Liang & Yong Chen
February, 2005
-
Do short sellers target firms
with poor earnings quality? Evidence from earnings restatements
by Hemang
Desai, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, & Kumar Venkataraman
Cox School of Business & SUNY - Binghampton University
July 19, 2005
-
A Double Sharpe Ratio
by
Hrishikesh D. Vinod & Matthew R. Morey
Fordham University & Pace University
June 1, 1999
-
Downside Risk Metrics applied to
Hedge Funds: An overview and some extensions
by Josep
Perello
University of Barcelona
-
Dry Markets and Statistical
Arbitrage Bounds for European Derivatives
by Joao
Amaro de Matos & Ana Lacerda
2006
-
The Due Diligence Defense Under
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
by William K. Sjostrom, Jr.
November 17, 2005
-
Dynamic Conditional Correlation:
A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive
Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models
by Robert Engle
New York University - Department of Finance
July, 2002
-
Dynamic Investment Strategies:
Portfolio Insurance Versus Efficient Frontier
by Sergei Esipov & Igor Vaysburd
Centre Solutions & Martingale Technologies, Inc.
-
Dynamic models for fixed-income
portfolio management under uncertainty
by Stavros
A. Zenios, Martin R. Holmer, Raymond McKendall, Christiana
Vassiadou-Zeniou
University of Cyprus
March 15, 1999
|
| |
The Dangers of Historical Hedge
Fund Data
by Andrew
B. Weisman & Jerome D. Abernathy
July 2003
Abstract
Risk budgeting provides an excellent framework for combining the
competing
interests of mean-variance efficiency and the precise liability
constraints faced by
an institutional investor. Such a framework is not however
directly applicable to
certain classes of investments, most notably hedge funds. The
risk budgeting
process typically requires the development of statistically
derived
characterizations of targeted investments...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Dangers of Mechanical
Investment Decision-Making: The Case of Hedge Funds
by Harry M. Kat
November 28, 2003
Abstract
Over the last 20 years, investors have come to approach
investment decision-making in an increasingly mechanical manner.
Optimisers are filled up with historical return data and the
‚optimal™ portfolio follows almost automatically. In this paper
we argue that such an approach can be extremely dangerous,
especially when alternative investments such as hedge funds are
involved...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Dealers’ Hedging of Interest Rate
Options in the U.S. Dollar Fixed-Income Market
by John E.
Kambhu
Stern School of Business, New York University & Stanford
University
Abstract
As derivatives markets have grown, the scope of financial
intermediation has evolved beyond credit intermediation to cover
a wide variety of risks. Financial
derivatives allow dealers to intermediate the risk management
needs of their customers by unbundling customer exposures and
reallocating them through the derivatives markets. In this way,
a customer’s unwanted risks can be traded away or hedged, while
other exposures are retained...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
A Decomposition of Stock Index
Futures Mispricing and the Price Effects of Index Arbitrage
by Andrew
West
February, 2003
Abstract
This paper uses a vector autoregressive system of equations to
model the dynamic interactions between an equities index, stock
index futures contract and mispricing series. It is suggested
that stock index futures mispricing is a result of
inefficiencies in both the equity market and the futures market.
This is confirmed by a decomposition of the mispricing series,
which demonstrates that information arriving in the futures
market, proxied by a permanent unexpected change in the futures
price, is only partially impounded by the index and only with a
protracted lag...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Defaults & Returns on High Yield
Bonds: Analysis Through 2001
by Edward I. Altman and Pablo Arman
Abstract
The year 2001 was remarkable on many fronts.For the high yield
market, it was a year of crushing record numbers of defaults and
distressed exchanges, combined with predictable low recovery
rates. Despite these fundamental problems and the “flight to
quality” following the terrorist attacks in September, the high
yield market displayed impressive resiliency...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Default Risk of High-Yield
Bonds
by Cynthia G. McDonald & Linda M. Van De Gucht
University of Missouri at Columbia & Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven
July, 1996
Abstract
This paper investigates the default behavior of original issue
rated non-convertible high-yield bonds. Previous studies of
high-yield bond defaults provide evidence of an aging effect:
the longer bonds have been outstanding, the greater the default
probability. However, Blume, Keim and Patel (1991) assert that
this aging relationship reflects changing economic conditions...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Derivation of the Mean-Gini
Efficient Portfolio Frontier
by Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and Hebrew University of
Jerusalem
October 3, 2002
Abstract
One main advantage of the mean-variance (MV) portfolio frontier
is its simplicity and ease of derivation. Its major shortcoming
lies in its familiar restrictions, such as the quadraticity of
preferences or the normality of distributions. We derive the
mean-Gini (MG) efficient portfolio frontier as a workable
alternative to MV. If asset distributions are restricted, the MG
frontier derivation is identical in structure to the
MV-efficient frontier derivation. The price paid for this
simplicity is that some information about the distribution of
assets gets lost. We numerically derive MG and mean-extended
Gini (MEG) efficient frontiers and compare the results to the MV
frontier. MEG allows for the explicit introduction of risk
aversion in building the efficient frontier. For U.S. classes of
assets, MG and MEG efficient portfolios constructed using
Ibbotson monthly returns appear to be more diversified than MV
portfolios. When short sales are allowed, distinct investor risk
aversions lead to different patters of portfolio
diversification, a result that is less obvious when short sales
are forecasted.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Detecting Changes of the
Efficient Frontier Allocation in an Elliptical Model
by Taras Bodnar & Wolfgang Schmid
Department of Statistics, European University Viadrina
Abstract
In this paper we derive the econometrical background for
detecting structural changes in the efficient frontier
allocation assuming asset returns to be matrix elliptically
contoured distributed. This is done in both cases: with or
without a riskless rate. Our results generalize the findings of
Bodnar and Schmid (2004b), who considered the distributional
properties of the efficient frontier estimator and presented the
test for the mean-variance efficiency in the normal case...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Detecting Switching Strategies in
Equity Hedge Funds
by Carol Alexander & Anca Dimitriu
ISMA Centre, University of Reading
April, 2005
Abstract
Equity hedge funds are thought to effectively operate market
timing by implementing switching strategies conditional on
market circumstances. In this paper we use only the reported
monthly returns on a set of funds to infer the type of switching
strategies they follow, if any, as well as their switching
times. A set of regime-switching models for each equity hedge
funds' returns against various benchmarks are estimated;
subsequently we answer the following general questions: What
proportion of equity funds seem to have switching strategies in
place?...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Determinants and Implications of
Arbitrage Holdings in Acquisitions
by Jim Hsieh & Ralph A. Walkling
Ohio State University
June, 1999
Abstract
This study investigates arbitrage activities and their impact on
acquisitions. The literature contains arguments for both passive
and active roles of arbitrageurs during the takeover process.
Larcker and Lys (1987) suggest that arbitrageurs are passive,
having superior ability to predict offer success...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Deviation Measures in Generalized
Linear Regression
by R.
Tyrrell Rockafellar, Stanislav Uryasev, & Michael Zabarankin
University of Florida, Gainesville
December 21, 2002
Abstract
Linear regression is traditionally based on the minimization of
variance, or equivalently, standard deviation, but other
approaches are possible in which standard deviation is replaced
by something more general. A one-to-one correspondence is now
known between risk measures, such as have been introduced for
various applications in finance, and a large class of deviation
measures characterized by simple axioms. Included in that class
are asymmetric measures coming from conditional value-at-risk
and other currently attractive notions. This paper looks at
deviation in that wide sense, formulating the associated problem
of regression and investigating the existence and uniqueness of
the coefficients that constitute a solution. Such coefficients
are characterized in ways that provide a key to their
computation.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Differentiability of the
Efficient Frontier when Commitment to Risk Sharing is Limited
by Thorsten V. Koeppl
European Central Bank
February, 2003
Abstract
This paper shows that the value function describing efficient
risk sharing with
limited commitment is not necessarily differentiable everywhere.
We demonstrate
that as a consequence it can be efficient for consumption in the
long-run to be
independent of lagged income even if limited commitment prevents
first-best risk
sharing. Provided agents are symmetric this result is linked to
the differentiability
of the efficient frontier at the point where all agents are
promised the same level of utility...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Direct Tests of Index Arbitrage
Models
by Robert
Neal
Kelley School of Business, Indiana University
December, 1996
Abstract
Previous tests of stock index arbitrage models have rejected the
no-arbitrage constraint imposed by these models. This paper
provides a detailed analysis of actual S&P 500 arbitrage trades
and directly relates these trades to the predictions of index
arbitrage models. An analysis of arbitrage trades suggests that
i) short-sale rules are unlikely to affect the cash-futures
mispricing, ii) the opportunity cost of arbitrage funds exceeds
the Treasury bill rate, and iii) the average price discrepancy
captured by arbitrage trades is small...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Distressed Debt-Investing in
Deutschland
by Christoph Schalast and Christian Daynes
HfB Business School of Finance & Management
September, 2005
Abstract
The global distressed debt market has been established for some
years now, however within this investment universe German
Distressed Debt is generally considered as underdeveloped. The
aim of this paper is to highlight why Investments are transacted
and the framework of processes involved within the German market
additionally; the paper focuses on current active investors and
concludes with a market survey covering the impressions of these
participants.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Diversification Benefits and
Persistence of U.S.-Based Global Bond Funds
by Sirapat Polwitoon & Oranee Tawatnuntachai
Sigmund Weis School of Business & School of Business
Administration - Penn State
May, 2005
Abstract
This paper examines diversification benefits and performance
persistence of 188 U.S.-based global bond funds that survived
and were defunct during the period of 1993 to 2004. Consistent
with managed fund literature, global funds underperform
broad-based benchmark indexes; however, the underperformance is
less than the funds’ expense ratio. The results using both
simple and time-varying frameworks suggest that global funds
provide higher total return and comparable risk-adjusted return
to domestic bond funds...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
Diversification and Persistence
in Hedge Funds
by Craig W. French, Damian B. Ko, & David Abuaf
Corbin Capital Partners, L.P.
October 31, 2005
Abstract
We examine the current fund of hedge funds universe, and find
that funds of hedge funds report holding between 1 and 200
underlying funds, and generally hold 10-30, with close to 20 on
average. We regress the performance of this universe on the
number of holdings and find that return is practically
orthogonal to the number of underlying hedge funds held.
However, when we regress risk-adjusted return measured by the ex
post Sharpe ratios of funds-of-hedge funds, we do find a
statistically significant positive relation over 5-year periods;
this seems consistent with our findings that diversification
reduces volatility...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Diversification Properties of
Hedge Fund Investments
by Eckhard Freimann
Imperial College, London
Abstract
This study analyses the trade off between manager specific and
systematic risk of portfolio of hedge funds. We compare the
properties of naively constructed portfolios with those of fund
of hedge funds, in order to assess the added value of the hedge
fund managers. The results suggest that the hedge fund investor
is confronted with the dilemma of having either a concentrated
portfolio with a high volatility but a low systematic risk or
holding a well diversified portfolio with a low volatility but a
high systematic risk...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Diversification and Yield
Enhancement with Hedge Funds
by Gaurav S. Amin & Harry M. Kat
Schroder Hedge Funds, London & Cass Business School - City
University, London
October 7, 2002
Abstract
In this paper we study the diversification effects from
introducing hedge funds into a traditional portfolio of stocks
and bonds. We find that although the inclusion of hedge funds
may significantly improve a portfolio’s mean-variance
characteristics, it can also be expected to lead to
significantly lower skewness as well as higher kurtosis. This
means that the case for hedge funds is less straightforward than
often suggested and includes a definite trade-off between profit
and loss potential...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Diversifying among Hedge Fund
Strategies: An Alternative Frontier
by Emily Perskie
Duke University
Spring 2003
Abstract
The goal of this study is to create optimal portfolios of hedge
funds. This paper discusses the different investment styles
within the hedge fund universe along with their specific risk,
return, and correlation characteristics. Markowitz’s portfolio
selection model is used to create an efficient frontier to
determine the best way for an investor to allocate capital among
hedge fund strategies...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Diversifying Market Risk through Market-Neutral
Strategies
by Marco A. Navone
Financial Markets & Institutions Department - Bocconi University
September 19, 2001
Abstract
Usually hedge funds are linked to concepts such "superior
selection ability" and "abnormal returns" (subject to abnormal
risks). Recent literature has pointed out that seldom hedge
funds achieve performances significantly higher than broad
capitalization market indices or mutual funds, and that
basically hedge funds are just a different way to rule the
agency relation between investors and the investment manager.
From this consideration follows that one of the most important
features of hedge funds is the manager's ability to take both
long and short positions on the markets...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Do Banks Strategically Time
Public Bond Issuance to Manipulate the Accompanying Disclosure,
Due Diligence, and Investor Scrutiny?
by Daniel M. Covitz & Paul Harrison
Federal Reserve Board
April, 2002
Abstract
This paper tests and finds evidence for a new hypothesis that
bank managers time their firm’s public bond issuance in order to
manipulate the accompanying disclosure, due diligence and
investor scrutiny. The main testable implication of this
hypothesis is that the observable credit quality of a bank
should improve around or after bond issuance. We test this and
other implications of the hypothesis, controlling for
alternative explanations, using a data set that combines ratings
migrations, equity returns, bond issuance, and balance sheet
data for US bank holding companies...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
Does Foreign Ownership Contribute
to Sounder Banks in Emerging Markets? The Latin American
Experience
by Jennifer S. Crystal, B. Gerard Dages, & Linda S. Goldberg
by Federal Reserve Bank of New York
May 29, 2001
Abstract
Foreign bank entrants into emerging markets are usually thought
to improve the condition and performance of acquired
institutions, and more generally to enhance local financial
stability. We use bank-specific data for a range of Latin
American countries since the mid-1990s to address elements of
this claim. Across the seven largest countries, we find that the
financial strength ratings of local banks acquired by foreign
entities generally show a slight improvement relative to their
domestic counterparts...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Does the Use of Financial
Derivatives Affect Earnings Management Decisions?
by Jan Barton
Goizueta Business School - Emory University
January 22, 2000
Abstract
I examine the effects of derivatives use on earnings management
behavior. I develop a self-selection simultaneous-equations
model that captures managers' incentives to use derivatives and
manage discretionary accruals. Empirical results from estimating
the model on 1994-1996 data for a sample of 304 Fortune 500
firms indicate that firms with larger derivatives portfolios
have lower levels of
discretionary accruals...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Do fixed income securities also
show asymmetric effects in conditional second moments?
by Lorenzo
Cappiello
Abstract
The so-called “asymmetric volatility” phenomenon is one of the
empirical regularities shown by (conditional) estimates of
equity second moments. Typically, volatility increases more
after negative than positive return shocks of the same
magnitude, and, sometimes, it even falls subsequent to an
increase in stock prices. Two explanations have been put forth
for this phenomenon: The leverage effect hypothesis, due to
Black (1976) and Christie (1982), and the volatility feedback
effect proposed by Campbell and Hentschell (1992) and extended
by Wu (2000). Surprisingly, whereas there has been a
proliferation of conditional econometric models able to capture
asymmetry in volatility (see Hentscell, 1995, for a synthesis),
there is a lack of conditional econometric specifications able
to explicitly model asymmetry in covariances.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Do Hedge Funds Have Enough
Capital? A Value-at-Risk Approach
by Anurag
Gupta & Bing Liang
February, 2003
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the risk characteristics and capital
adequacy of hedge funds using Value-at-Risk (based on Extreme
Value Theory) as the criterion for measuring risk and estimating
capital requirements. Using extensive data on nearly thirteen
hundred live and dead hedge funds, we find that the vast
majority
of funds are adequately capitalized. In addition, a large
fraction of hedge funds maintain risk profiles comparable to
that of an equivalent investment in a broad equity market index
(like the S&P 500). From the perspective of capital adequacy
concerns, our results lend support to the arguments against
stricter regulation and oversight of the hedge fund industry, in
contrast to some regulators’ desire and inclination towards
increased regulation.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
Do Market Timing Hedge Funds Time
the Market?
by Bing
Liang & Yong Chen
February, 2005
Abstract
This paper examines whether market timing hedge funds, the
self-claimed market timers, have the ability to time the market
in the dimension of both return and volatility. Based on the
market timing models of Treynor-Mazuy (1966), Henriksson-Merton
(1981), and Busse (1999), we incorporate public information,
derivative trading, and illiquid holding in our tests in order
to capture the dynamic trading behavior of hedge fund managers.
More importantly, we develop a new market timing model to test
return timing and volatility timing jointly. This new model
relates hedge fund returns to the squared Sharpe ratio of the
market portfolio. With a sample of 157 market timing funds from
TASS, HFR and TUNA databases, we find strong evidence of both
return timing and volatility timing during the period 1990-2003.
In particular, market timing exists mainly in bear market
states. Cross-sectional analysis indicates that timing ability
is related to some fund characteristics. Our results are
confirmed by various robustness tests including bootstrap
analysis.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Do short sellers target firms
with poor earnings quality? Evidence from earnings restatements
by Hemang
Desai, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, & Kumar Venkataraman
Cox School of Business & SUNY - Binghampton University
July 19, 2005
Abstract
We study the behavior of short sellers around earnings
restatements. We find that short sellers start accumulating
positions in the restatements firms several months in advance of
the restatement announcement and subsequently unwind these
positions after the drop in share price induced by the
restatement. The increase in short interest is larger for firms
with high levels of accruals prior to the restatement, and the
association between short interest and accruals is robust to
controlling for firm size, book-to-market ratio and residual
standard deviation...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
A Double Sharpe Ratio
by
Hrishikesh D. Vinod & Matthew R. Morey
Fordham University & Pace University
June 1, 1999
Abstract
Sharpe's (1966) portfolio performance ratio, the ratio of the
portfolio's expected return to its standard deviation, is a very
well known tool for comparing portfolios. However, due to the
presence of random denominators in the definition of the ratio,
the sampling distribution of the Sharpe ratio is somewhat
difficult to determine. This paper studies the properties of
Sharpe ratio and then uses the bootstrap methodology to suggest
a new "double" Sharpe ratio which incorporates estimation
risk...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Downside Risk Metrics applied to
Hedge Funds: An overview and some extensions
by Josep
Perello
University of Barcelona
Abstract
Hedge Funds are considered as one of the portfolio management
sectors which
shows a fastest growing for the past few years. These funds have
been in
existence for several decades but they do not have become
popular until the
1990’s. It is said that Hedge Funds are capable of making huge
profits but
sometimes we get some news announcing that a certain Hedge Fund
suffered
spectacular losses, not very often as someone might say...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Dry Markets and Statistical
Arbitrage Bounds for European Derivatives
by Joao
Amaro de Matos & Ana Lacerda
2006
Abstract
We derive statistical arbitrage bounds for the buying and
selling price of European derivatives under incomplete markets.
In this paper, incompleteness is generated due to the fact that
the market is dry, i.e., the underlying asset cannot be
transacted at certain points in time. In particular, we refine
the notion of statistical arbitrage in order to extend the
procedure for the case where dryness is random, i.e., at each
point in time the asset can be transacted with a given
probability...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Due Diligence Defense Under
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
by William K. Sjostrom, Jr.
November 17, 2005
Abstract
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 imposes civil liability
for misstatements or omissions of material facts in a securities
offering registration statement. Potential section 11 defendants
include the issuer, directors, underwriters and accountants.
Although section 11 was designed to have an in terrorem effect
on these parties, section 11 liability is not absolute...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
Dynamic Investment Strategies:
Portfolio Insurance Versus Efficient Frontier
by Sergei Esipov & Igor Vaysburd
Centre Solutions & Martingale Technologies, Inc.
Abstract
Selected dynamic investment strategies are analyzed within a
unifying theoretical
framework. We suggest a Kolmogorov-type partial differential
equation for a profit and loss (P&L) distribution of strategies
contingent on the current value of the basic asset as well as on
a balance of a trading account –“P&L-to-date”. This gives a
possibility to study much wider class of strategies than is
usually done in the literature and practical applications...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Dynamic models for fixed-income
portfolio management under uncertainty
by Stavros
A. Zenios, Martin R. Holmer, Raymond McKendall, Christiana
Vassiadou-Zeniou
University of Cyprus
March 15, 1999
Abstract
We develop multi-period dynamic models for fixed-income
portfolio management under uncertainty, using multi-stage
stochastic programming with recourse. The models integrate the
prescriptive stochastic programs with descriptive Monte Carlo
simulation models of the term structure of interest rates.
Extensive validation experiments are carried out to establish
the effectiveness of the models in hedging against uncertainty,
and to assess their performance vis-a`-vis single-period
models...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
|
|
A
B
C D
E F
G
H I
J
K
L
M N
O P
Q
R S
T U
V
W
X Y Z
| HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER
DISCLOSURES |
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge
Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or
pools that may invest and trade in many different markets,
strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and
derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements
as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide
certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information
to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge
Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should
carefully note the following:
- Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a
high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial
portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial
ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the
risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital
set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for
all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in
Hedge Funds.
- Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by
federal or state regulators
- Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and
a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
- An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be
significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge
Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in
a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
- A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or
performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance
which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or
advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not
place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
- A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority
over the Hedge Fund.
- A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single
strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher
risk.
- A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers
or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of
third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be
disclosed to investors
- A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should
be reviewed carefully.
- A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may
cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
- A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its
underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds
structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way
for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the
Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the
sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s
investment strategy or risk levels.
- A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on
foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean
higher risk.
- A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial
regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s
trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are
generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels;
therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged
if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
- Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or
valuation information to investors.
- Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to
various conflicts of interest.
The above general
summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important
disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect
to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and
specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective
offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should
thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the
investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an
investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light
of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and
tax situation.
All performance information is believed
to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No
representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve
its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve
results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or
will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance
is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future
results.
The information on the Site is intended for
informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on
this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as,
financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the
appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be
an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any
security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or
fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the
delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors.
Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the
particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your
financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as
you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice
and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for
the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we
assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions
or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any
person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.
The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated,
is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the
more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a
particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly
from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment
returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied
by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although
believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its
completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express
or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy,
validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this
information.
Any indices and other financial benchmarks
shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged,
reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the
impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an
index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have
volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a
particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold
substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index.
Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are
not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge
fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of
an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied
upon as an accurate measure of comparison.
|
|