FREE ACCESS!
Subscribe for
Free Access
to over 4000+
pages of Profiles and Top
20 Rankings.
No obligation ever.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beta Related Scholarly Compositions
See also:
Beta Related News,
Beta
Related Books,
or
Beta Home Page.
|
| Table of Contents:
|
| |
Alternative Tests of the
Zero-Beta CAPM
by Pin-Huang Chou
National Central University
Abstract
In this paper I develop an analytical Wald test of the zero-beta
capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in a simple iid (independent
and identically distributed) setting, and extend the Wald test
to the generalized method of moments (GMM) framework that allows
for a general form of serial correlation and conditional
heteroscedasticity. The size and power of these tests, along
with some existing tests, are investigated under normal errors
and other alternative distributional specifications. The results
show that, under alternative distributional assumptions for the
error terms, the proposed Wald and GMM tests have reliable sizes
for medium-size samples, while the likelihood ratio test (LRT)
tends to reject the efficiency too often, especially when the
error terms significantly deviate from normality...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Comparative Analysis of Linear
Portfolio Rebalancing Strategies: An Application to Hedge Funds
University of Florida
November 19, 2001
Abstract
This paper applies formal risk management methodologies to
optimization of a portfolio of hedge funds (fund of funds). We
compare recently developed risk
management methodologies: Conditional Value-at-Risk and
Conditional Drawdown-at-Risk with more established Mean-Absolute
Deviation, Maximum Loss, and Market Neutrality approaches. The
common property of considered risk management techniques is that
they admit the formulation of a portfolio optimization model as
a linear programming (LP) problem...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Growth, Beta and
Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios
by Michael S. Rozeff
SUNY at Buffalo - Department of Financial & Managerial Economics
September, 2004
Abstract
A model of optimal dividend payout is presented in which
increased dividends lower agency costs but raise the
transactions cost of external financing. The optimal dividend
payout ratio minimizes the sum of these two costs. A
cross-sectional test of the model relates dividend payout to the
fraction of equity held by insiders, the past and expected
future revenue growth of the firm, the firm's beta coefficient,
and the number of common stockholders.
The
coefficients of all variables are significant in the predicted
directions. The results indicate that investment policy
influences dividend policy.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Hedge Funds: Bubble or New
Paradigm?
by Alexander M. Ineichen, CFA
UBS Warburg
November, 2001
Abstract
To some, hedge fund investing is a bubble, to others absolute
return strategies is a New Paradigm in asset management. Reality
is probably somewhere in between. On one hand expectations of
high positive absolute returns from hedge funds when equity
markets fall are probably too exaggerated. On the other hand,
the focus on positive absolute returns and defining risk in a
value-at-risk context might be in the process of replacing the
relative return approach.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Hedge Funds Investing: A
Quantitative Look Inside the Black Box
by François-Serge Lhabitant
August 2001
Abstract
There is an increasing amount of evidence that shows the
benefits of considering hedge funds as an asset class at the
strategic asset allocation level. The investors’ greatest
challenge remains the identification of desirable investment
vehicles, since very little formal quantitative analysis of
hedge funds has been done in the past. In this paper, we suggest
an innovative approach to hedge fund investing, which is valid
at the individual fund level as well as at the aggregate
portfolio level (e.g. portfolio of hedge funds)...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
High Water Marks
by William N. Goetzmann, Jonathan Ingersoll Jr., & Stephen A.
Ross
Yale School of Management
July 9, 1997
Abstract
Incentive fees for money managers are frequently accompanied by
high water mark provisions which condition the payment of the
incentive upon exceeding the maximum achieved share value. In
this paper, we show that these high water mark contracts are
valuable to money managers, and conversely represent a claim on
a significant proportion of investor wealth. We provide a
closed-form solution to the high water mark contract under
certain conditions...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
How to Price Hedge Funds: From
Two-to-Four-Moment CAPM
by Angelo Ranaldo & Laurent Favre
UBS Global Asset Management & UBS Wealth Management
October 2003
Abstract
The CAPM model has serious difficulties to explain the past
superior performance of most hedge funds. The purpose of this
research is to analyze how to price hedge funds. We compare the
traditional CAPM based on the Markowitz mean-variance criterion
with extensions of the CAPM that account for coskewness and
cokurtosis. The key result is that the risk-return
characteristics of hedge funds can differ widely. The use of a
unique pricing model may be misleading. The beta is an
exhaustive risk measure only for some hedge funds. Other hedge
funds have significant coskewness and cokurtosis. The lack of
consideration of higher moments may lead to an insufficient
compensation for the investment risk.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Learning About Beta: An
Explanation of the Value Premium
by Tobias Adrian and Francesco Franzoni
November 26, 2002
Abstract
We develop an equilibrium model of learning about time-varying
risk factor loadings. In the model, CAPM holds from investors’
ex-ante perspective. However, positive mispricing can be
observed when investors ’expectations of beta are above ex-post
realizations...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
The Life Cycle of Hedge Funds:
Fund Flows, Size and Performance
by Mila Getmansky
January 2, 2005
Abstract
Since the 1980s we have seen a 25% yearly increase in the number
of hedge funds, and an annual attrition rate of 7.10% due to
liquidation. This paper analyzes the life cycles of hedge funds.
Using the TASS database provided by the Tremont Company, it
studies industry and fund specific factors that affect the
survival probability of hedge funds...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Market Bubbles & Wasteful
Avoidance:
Tax & Regulatory Constraints on Short Sales
by Michael R. Powers, David M. Schizer, and Martin Shubik
Cowles Foundation For Research In Economics
Yale University
April, 2003
Abstract
Although short sales make an important contribution to financial
markets, this transaction faces legal constraints that do not
govern long positions. In evaluating these constraints, other
commentators, who are virtually all economists, have not focused
rigorously enough on the precise contours of current law. Some
short sale constraints are mischaracterized, while others are
omitted entirely. Likewise, the existing literature neglects
many strategies in which well advised investors circumvent these
constraints; this avoidance may reduce the impact of short sale
constraints on market prices, but may contribute to social waste
in other ways. To fill these gaps in the literature, this paper
offers a careful look at current law and draws three
conclusions. First, short sales play a valuable role in the
financial markets; while there may be plausible reasons to
regulate short sales – most notably, concerns about market
manipulation and panics – current law is very poorly tailored to
these goals. Second, investor self-help can ease some of the
harm from this poor tailoring, but at a cost. Third, relatively
straightforward reforms can eliminate the need for self-help
while accommodating legitimate regulatory goals. In making these
points, we focus primarily on a burden that other commentators
have neglected: profits from short sales generally are
ineligible for the reduced tax rate on long-term capital gains,
even if the short sale is in place for more than one year.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Market Microstructure
by Hans R. Stoll
Owen Graduate School of Management
May 19, 2003
Abstract
Market microstructure deals with the purest form of financial
intermediation -- the trading of a financial asset, such as a
stock or a bond. In a trading market, assets are not transformed
but are simply transferred from one investor to another. The
field of market microstructure studies the cost of trading
securities and the impact of trading costs on the short-run
behavior of securities prices...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Mechanisms of Market
Efficiency Twenty Years Later:
The Hindsight Bias
by Ronald J. Gilson and Reinier Kraakman
October, 2003
This is a propitious time to revisit The Mechanisms of Market
Efficiency
(“MOME”). We began that project some twenty years ago, as newly
minted corporate law academics trying to understand what to make
of a large empirical literature proclaiming the efficiency of
the U.S. stock market. In an observation then offered as a
simple description of the state of play, Michael Jensen had
announced that “there is no other proposition in economics which
has more solid empirical evidence supporting it than the
Efficient Market Hypothesis.”...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Offshore Hedge Funds: Survival &
Performance 1989-1995
by Stephen J. Brown, William N. Goetzmann, and Roger G. Ibbotson
NYU Stern School of Business & Yale School of Management
January 2, 1998
Abstract
We examine the performance of the off-shore hedge fund industry
over the period 1989 through 1995 using a database that includes
both defunct and currently operating funds. The industry is
characterized by high attrition rates of funds, low covariance
with the U.S. stock market, evidence consistent with positive
risk-adjusted returns over the time, but little evidence of
differential manager skill...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
On the Performance of Hedge Funds
by Bing Liang
Weatherhead School of Management
Case Western Reserve University
May, 1998
Abstract
This paper investigates hedge fund performance and risk. The
empirical evidence indicates that hedge funds differ
substantially from traditional investment vehicles such as
mutual funds. The funds with watermarks significantly outperform
the funds without watermarks. The average hedge fund returns are
related positively to incentive fees, the size of the fund, and
the lockup period. Hedge funds follow dynamic trading strategies
and have low systematic risk. There are low correlations among
different strategies. Compared with mutual funds, hedge funds
offer better risk-return trade-offs: they have higher Sharpe
ratios, lower mrket risks, and higher abnormal returns. In the
period of January 1994 to December 1996, most hedge funds
provide positive abnormal returns. Overall, hedge fund
strategies dominate mutual fund strategies, hence hedge funds
provide a more efficient investment opportunity set for
investors.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Optimal Mixing of Hedge Funds with Traditional
Investment Vehicles
by Noel Amenc & Lionel Martellini
EDHEC Graduate School of Business
February 15, 2003
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the state-of-the art techniques for
optimal asset allocation to traditional and alternative
investment vehicles, and we specifically account for the
difficulties in estimating risk/return parameters from hedge
fund return data. We first present various techniques allowing
an investor to better assess the contrasted diversification
properties of hedge funds. In particular, we introduce a
multi-factor framework for the assessment of which funds should
be included for which portfolio. We also present various
competing models allowing investors to get a quantitative
estimate of the optimal fraction of a given portfolio that
should be allocated to hedge funds, in a context where only
imperfect estimates of hedge fund expected returns are
available. We not only discuss optimal strategic asset
allocation decisions; we also explain how tactical asset
decisions can also be made in a portfolio mixing traditional and
alternative investment vehicles. Finally, we show how hedge fund
can be used as portable alpha vehicles in a core/satellite
portfolio approach.
Visit www.EDHEC-Risk.com for the full
paper...
▲
top
|
| |
The Performance of Hedge Funds:
Risk, Return and Incentives
by Carl Ackermann, Richard McEnally, and David Ravenscraft
October, 1998
Abstract
Hedge funds display several interesting characteristics that may
influence performance. These include flexible investment
strategies, strong managerial incentives, substantial managerial
investment, sophisticated investors, and limited government
oversight. Using a large sample of hedge fund data from
1988-1995, we find that hedge funds consistently outperform
mutual funds, but not standard market indices...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Quantitative Selection of
Long-Short Hedge Funds
by Kaifeng Chen & Alexander Passow
University of Lausanne, GOTTEX, and FAME
July, 2003
Abstract
We
develop a quantitative model to select hedge funds in the
long-short equity sector. The selection strategy is verified on
a survivorship-bias-free hedge fund database, from January 1990
to September 2002. We focus on the hedge funds acting
exclusively in the U.S. market. We identify Fama-French factors
and GSCI as the risk factors. Based on the evidence that many
hedge funds do not exhibit persistent performance, we believe
that persistent alpha is not generated based on publicly
available information and opportunistic changes of exposure with
respect to the risk factors. Instead we expect moderate exposure
funds to be those who establish investment decisions based on
special information or proprietary research. A hedge fund
selection strategy is introduced and checked with out-of-sample
data. A simulation of hedge funds from 1927 to 2002 is
conducted. The funds selected according to our strategy
demonstrate superior performance persistently.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Realized Beta: Persistence and
Predictability
by Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and
Jin Wu
January, 2003
Abstract
A large literature over several decades reveals both extensive
concern with the question of time-varying betas and an emerging
consensus that betas are in fact time-varying, leading to the
prominence of the conditional CAPM. Set against that background,
we assess the dynamics in realized betas, vis-à-vis the dynamics
in the underlying realized market variance and individual equity
covariances with the market. Working in the recently-popularized
framework of realized volatility, we are led to a model of
nonlinear fractional cointegration: although realized variances
and covariances are very highly persistent and fractionally
integrated, realized betas, which are simple nonlinear functions
of those realized variances and covariances, are less
persistent, and arguably best modeled as a standard stationary
I(0) process...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
|
|
The Relative Efficiency of Beta
Estimates (Working Paper)
by Jan Bartholdy & Paula Peare
Aarhus School of Business
March, 2001
Abstract
When estimation of beta is based on the Capital Asset Pricing
Model the standard
recommendation is to use five years of monthly data and a
value-weighted index.
Given the importance of the beta estimate obtained for financial
decisions, such as those involved in portfolio management,
capital budgeting, and performance
evaluation, there is surprisingly little research evidence in
support of this
recommendation. The objective of this paper is to address this
shortcoming. For this purpose the relative efficiency of beta
estimates which result from using different data frequencies,
time periods, and indexes is examined. It is found that five
years of monthly data and an equal-weighted index, as opposed to
the commonly recommended value-weighted index, provides the most
efficient estimate.
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Return Distributions of Private
Real Estate Investments
by Roger Jelks Brown
The Pennsylvania State University - The Graduate School
Department of Insurance and Real Estate
May, 2000
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the distribution of returns
accruing to individual
owners of investment real estate property. Previously, most
research in investment real estate concentrated upon large
institutional owners using finance paradigms, tools and
methodology.
Other researchers have questioned the use of finance models,
predominantly
Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), for real estate research...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
|
|
| |
Risk Management for Hedge Funds:
Introduction and Overview
by Andrew W. Lo
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of
Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
June 7, 2001
Abstract
Although risk management has been a well-ploughed field in
financial modeling for over two decades, traditional risk
management tools such as mean-variance analysis, beta, and
Value-at-Risk do not capture many of the risk exposures of
hedge-fund investments. In this article, I review several
aspects of risk management that are unique to hedge funds -
survivorship bias, dynamic risk analytics, liquidity, and
nonlinearities - and provide examples that illustrate their
potential importance to hedge-fund managers and investors. I
propose a research agenda for developing a new set of risk
analytics specifically designed for hedge-fund investments, with
the ultimate goal of creating risk transparency while, at the
same time, protecting the proprietary nature of hedge-fund
investment strategies...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Style Consistency and Survival
Probability in the Hedge Funds Industry
by Pierre-Antoine Bares, Rajna Gibson, & Sebastien Gyger
University of Zurich - Swiss Banking Institute (ISB)
February, 2001
Abstract
This study focuses on two problems that affect the choice of
alternative investments, that is the style consistency of the
manager and his survival probability. We first present a new
quantitative approach to describe fund managers style
consistency. We show, through hard and fuzzy clustering, that
the investment style of a manager may depart over time from his
reported style...
View entire composition
▲
top
|
| |
Back to Scholarly Compositions
See also:
Beta Related News,
Beta Related
Books,
or
Beta Home
Page.
| HEDGE FUND RISK AND OTHER
DISCLOSURES |
Hedge funds, including fund of funds (“Hedge
Funds”), are unregistered private investment partnerships, funds or
pools that may invest and trade in many different markets,
strategies and instruments (including securities, non-securities and
derivatives) and are NOT subject to the same regulatory requirements
as mutual funds, including mutual fund requirements to provide
certain periodic and standardized pricing and valuation information
to investors. There are substantial risks in investing in Hedge
Funds. Persons interested in investing in Hedge Funds should
carefully note the following:
- Hedge Funds represent speculative investments and involve a
high degree of risk. An investor could lose all or a substantial
portion of his/her investment. Investors must have the financial
ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the
risks of an investment in a Hedge Fund.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund should be discretionary capital
set aside strictly for speculative purposes.
- An investment in a Hedge Fund is not suitable or desirable for
all investors. Only qualified eligible investors may invest in
Hedge Funds.
- Hedge Fund offering documents are not reviewed or approved by
federal or state regulators
- Hedge Funds may be leveraged (including highly leveraged) and
a Hedge Fund’s performance may be volatile
- An investment in a Hedge Fund may be illiquid and there may be
significant restrictions on transferring interests in a Hedge
Fund. There is no secondary market for an investor’s investment in
a Hedge Fund and none is expected to develop.
- A Hedge Fund may have little or no operating history or
performance and may use hypothetical or pro forma performance
which may not reflect actual trading done by the manager or
advisor and should be reviewed carefully. Investors should not
place undue reliance on hypothetical or pro forma performance.
- A Hedge Fund’s manager or advisor has total trading authority
over the Hedge Fund.
- A Hedge Fund may use a single advisor or employ a single
strategy, which could mean a lack of diversification and higher
risk.
- A Hedge Fund (for example, a fund of funds) and its managers
or advisors may rely on the trading expertise and experience of
third-party managers or advisors, the identity of which may not be
disclosed to investors
- A Hedge Fund may involve a complex tax structure, which should
be reviewed carefully.
- A Hedge Fund may involve structures or strategies that may
cause delays in important tax information being sent to investors.
- A Hedge Fund may provide no transparency regarding its
underlying investments (including sub-funds in a fund of funds
structure) to investors. If this is the case, there will be no way
for an investor to monitor the specific investments made by the
Hedge Fund or, in a fund of funds structure, to know whether the
sub-fund investments are consistent with the Hedge Fund’s
investment strategy or risk levels.
- A Hedge Fund may execute a substantial portion of trades on
foreign exchanges or over-the-counter markets, which could mean
higher risk.
- A Hedge Fund’s fees and expenses-which may be substantial
regardless of any positive return- will offset the Hedge Fund’s
trading profits. In a fund of funds or similar structure, fees are
generally charged at the fund as well as the sub-fund levels;
therefore fees charged investors will be higher that those charged
if the investor invested directly in the sub-fund(s).
- Hedge Funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or
valuation information to investors.
- Hedge Funds and their managers/advisors may be subject to
various conflicts of interest.
The above general
summary is not a complete list of the risks and other important
disclosures involved in investing in Hedge Funds and, with respect
to any particular Hedge Fund, is subject to the more complete and
specific disclosures contained in such Hedge Fund’s respective
offering documents. Before making any investment, an investor should
thoroughly review a Hedge Fund’s offering documents with the
investor’s financial, legal and tax advisor to determine whether an
investment in the Hedge Fund is suitable for the investor in light
of the investor’s investment objectives, financial circumstances and
tax situation.
All performance information is believed
to be net of applicable fees unless otherwise specifically noted. No
representation is made that any fund will or is likely to achieve
its objectives or that any investor will or is likely to achieve
results comparable to those shown or will make any profit at all or
will be able to avoid incurring substantial losses. Past performance
is not necessarily indicative, and is no guarantee, of future
results.
The information on the Site is intended for
informational, educational and research purposes only. Nothing on
this Site is intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as,
financial, legal, tax or investment advice, be an opinion of the
appropriateness or suitability of an investment, or intended to be
an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any
security or an endorsement or inducement to invest with any fund or
fund manager. No such offer or solicitation may be made prior to the
delivery of appropriate offering documents to qualified investors.
Before making any investment, you should thoroughly review the
particular fund’s confidential offering documents with your
financial, legal and tax advisor and conduct such due diligence as
you (and they) deem appropriate. We do not provide investment advice
and no information or material on the Site is to be relied upon for
the purpose of making investment or other decisions. Accordingly, we
assume no responsibility or liability for a ny investment decisions
or advice, treatment, or services rendered by any investor or any
person or entity mentioned, featured on or linked to the Site.
The information on this Site is as of the date(s) indicated,
is not a complete description of any fund, and is subject to the
more complete disclosures and terms and conditions contained in a
particular fund's offering documents, which may be obtained directly
from the fund. Certain of the information, including investment
returns, valuations, fund targets and strategies, has been supplied
by the funds or their agents, and other third parties, and although
believed to be reliable, has not been independently verified and its
completeness and accuracy cannot be guaranteed. No warranty, express
or implied, representation or guarantee is made as to the accuracy,
validity, timeliness, completeness or suitability of this
information.
Any indices and other financial benchmarks
shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged,
reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the
impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an
index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have
volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a
particular hedge fund. For example, a hedge fund may typically hold
substantially fewer securities than are contained in an index.
Indices also may contain securities or types of securities that are
not comparable to those traded by a hedge fund. Therefore, a hedge
fund’s performance may differ substantially from the performance of
an index. Because of these differences, indexes should not be relied
upon as an accurate measure of comparison.
|
|